Telangana High Court
CRLP/9245/2012 of P.Varadaraju Vs The State of A.p., rep.by P.P., on 28 December 2012
SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No. 9246 of 2012 ORDER: The petitioner is A -7 in Crime No.239 of 2012 of Nampally P.S., Hyderabad District, registered for the offences under section 420, 468 and 471 of I.P.C. The accusation made against the petitioner is that he
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDYCriminal Petition No. 9246 of 2012
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner is A-7 in Crime No.239 of 2012 of Nampally P.S.,Hyderabad District, registered for the offences under section 420, 468and 471 of I.P.C.
The accusation made against the petitioner is that he collectedmoney from the complainant and others on the promise of assuringemployment in the High Court. The further accusation is that thepetitioner posed himself as an official of the High Court.
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learnedAddl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State.
It is contended by learned counsel appearing for the petitionerthat the name of the petitioner does not find place in the FirstInformation Report and therefore, he deserves for grant of bail.
Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for therespondent/State opposed the application on the ground thatinvestigation is pending.
As seen from the material placed on record, the petitioner actingthrough A-1/Ch.Narasimha Rao collected money posing himself as anofficial of the High Court. He even went to the extent of conductingfake interviews to the candidates. Such is the accusation leveledagainst the petitioner, he does not deserve for grant of bail pendinginvestigation. As soon as the investigation is completed, the petitioneris at liberty to renew his application for grant of bail.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
_____________________________
B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J
28.12.2012
GM