Telangana High Court
WP/23498/2004 of S. Madhukar, Vs The District Collector, on 31 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23498 of 2004 Between: 1 S.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 23498 of 2004
Between:
1 S. Madhukar, S/o. Nageswara Rao,
R/o. Opp. Prakasam Stadium, Madhura Basthi, Kothagudem, Khammam District.
2 Ch. Sai Sudha Mohan, S/o. Saibada,
R/o. Beside Ganesh Temple, Ganesh Bashi, Kothagudem, Khammam District. Khammam District.
AND
..... PETITIONER(S)
1 The District Collector, Khammam District, Khammam.
2 The Commissioner, Kothagudem Municipality, Kothagudem, Khammam District.
3 Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Rep by its Area Manager, Secunderabad.
4 P. Chandrasekhar Rao, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, R/o. Bhadrachalam, Khammam District.
5 N. Tilak, S/o. Mallikarjuna Rao,
R/o. Bhadrachalam, Khammam District.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an order or direction or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 3 herein in permitting therespondents 4 & 5 to establish retail outlet of Petrol Bunk of Hindustan PetroleumCorporation Ltd., in Sy.No. 142 at Mahatma Gandhi Road, Kothagudem town asillegal, arbitrary and against the interest of general public and consequently directthe respondents 1 to 3 herein not to accord any permission in favour of respondents 4 & 5 for establishing retail outlet of Petrol Bunk of Hindustan Petroleum CorporationLtd. in Sy.No. 142 of Kothagudem town, Khammam District and pass such otherorder or orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.BHEEMSEN & T.V.PRANAI KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUECounsel for the Respondent No.2:Mr. P. RadhakrishnaCounsel for the Respondent No.3: Mr. P.V. Sanjay KumarCounsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5: None appeared The Court made the following Oral Order: (per Sri Devinder Gupta, CJ)
There is already an order passed in Writ Petition No. 2559 of 2004 on 23.2.2004.There has been no subsequent development nor alleged in the writ petition.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as premature. No costs.
______________________
DEVINDER GUPTA, CJ
Date: 31[st] December, 2004
Pnb
_______________________
M. NARAYANA REDDY,J
To
1 The District Collector, Khammam District, Khammam.
2 The Commissioner, Kothagudem Municipality, Kothagudem, Khammam District.
3 The Area Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Secunderabad.
4 Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Revenue (OUT), High Court Buildings, Hyderabad.
5 Two C.D. copies