Telangana High Court

WP/22083/2008 of V. Bayapa Reddy, Vs The District Collector, on 31 December 2008

COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI. WRIT PETITION NO : 22083 of 2008 Between: 1 V. Bayapa Reddy, S/o. Vanam Venkataramanappa, 2 V. Adinarayana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT

:PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI.WRIT PETITION NO : 22083 of 2008

Between:

1 V. Bayapa Reddy, S/o. Vanam Venkataramanappa, 2 V. Adinarayana Reddy, S/o. Vanam Venkataramanappa,

..... Petitioners

AND1The District Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District.2 The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Land Acquisition Officer, Penukonda,Anantapur District.3 The Tahsildar, Chilamathur Mandal, Anantapur District.4 V. Govindappa, S/o. V. Bayanna, R/o. Thummalakunta, ChilamamthurMandal, Anantapur District.5 V. Babaiah, S/o. V. Adeppa, R/o. Thummalakunta, Chilamamthur Mandal,Anantapur District.

.....Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the respondents 1-3 in taking steps to disburse thecompensation amount in respect of petitioners' land in Sy.No. 6-1A of an extent ofAc. 4.22 cents and in Sy.No. 6-1B of an extent Ac. 3.05 cents situated atThummalakunta H/o. Chilamathur Village and Mandal, Anantapur District, withoutdeciding the petitioners' claim over the said property, is illegal, arbitrary and violativeof Article 14,21 and 300A of Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions ofLand Acquisition Act, 1894.

Page 1 of 2

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and theaffidavit filed in support there of and the High Court orders dated 29-10-200819.11.2008 ,17.12.2008 and 22-12-2008 made herein and upon hearing thearguments of Sri P. Narahari Babu, Advocate for the Petitioners, Govt.Pleader for Land Acquisition, for Respondents 1 to 3, and of Sri P. RoyReddy, for the respondents 4 & 5 the Court made the following:ORDER:

“At the request of the learned Govt.Pleader, Post on 31-12-2008 inmotion list.

The Interim order granted earlier shall continue till then”.

// TRUE COPY //

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

To

1 The District Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District.

2 The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Land Acquisition Officer, Penukonda, Anantapur District. Penukonda, Anantapur District.

3 The Tahsildar, Chilamathur Mandal, Anantapur District.

4 V. Govindappa, S/o. V. Bayanna,

5 V. Babaiah, S/o. V. Adeppa,

(Sl.Nos. 4 & 5 are R/o. Thummalakunta, Chilamamthur Mandal, Anantapur District.)

6 Two CCs to the Govt. Pleader for Land Acquisition, High Court Bldgs.,Hyd(OUT)Hyd(OUT)

7 One spare copy.

8 One CC to Sri P. Narahari Babu, Advocate. (OPUC)khbkhb HIGH COURT

RGJ

DATED:29-12-2008

POST ON 31.12.2008 IN MOTION LIST.

ORDER:

WP.NO.22083/2008

INTERIM ORDER IS EXTENDED

Drafted by khbDt. 30.12.2008.

HIGH COURT

RGJ

DATED:29-12-2008

POST ON .12.2008IN MOTION LIST.

ORDER:

WP.NO.22083/2008

INTERIM ORDER IS EXTENDED

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead