Telangana High Court
WP/393/2009 of M/s. E. Raghava Rao Grains AND General, Vs The Joint Collector, (Collector (CS)), on 30 December 2014
A . RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.393 of 2009 O R D E R: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAOWRIT PETITION No.393 of 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits thatthe relief sought in the writ petition has becomeinfructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ.petition is dismissed as infructuous Pendingmiscellaneous petitions, if any, shall standdismissed in consequence. No costs.
________________________________
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, JDate: December 30, 2014BSB
14HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.393 of 2009
BSB
Date: December 30, 2014