Telangana High Court
WA/1670/2014 of Smt.A. Mangamma Vs The Joint Collector, on 30 December 2014
THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.1670 of 2014 DATE: 30.12.2014 Between: Smt. A . Mangamma, Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District. … Appellant And The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdi-ka-pool,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT APPEAL No.1670 of 2014
Between:
DATE: 30.12.2014
Smt. A. Mangamma,Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District.
… Appellant
And
The Joint Collector,Ranga Reddy District,Lakdi-ka-pool, Hyderabad and others … Respondents This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT APPEAL No.1670 of 2014
Judgment:(per Sri Sanjay Kumar,J)
The petitioner in W.P.No.15315 of 2014 is in appeal against theorder dated 24.11.2014 passed therein dismissing the case. Wehowever find no grounds to interfere with the order passed by thelearned Single Judge for the reasons stated hereunder.
Admittedly, the writ petitioner did not claim any interest in theGovernment land situated in Survey No.910/2 of Malkajgiri Village. Helays claim only to the land in Survey No.910/1 of the said village,which is admitted by the State functionaries to be patta land.
Sri A. Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant-writpetitioner, however stated that as the writ petition was dismissed, therespondents may take steps to dispossess the appellant even beforeany delineation is carried out in terms of the order under appeal.
The learned Government Pleader for Revenue, however,submits that no steps would be taken for removal of encroachments inthe Government land until the survey is completed.
In the light of this statement, the apprehension of the appellant-writ petitioner stands redressed.
The Writ Appeal is accordingly closed.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also standclosed. No order as to costs.
_________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
Date: 30.12.2014
va
_________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J