Telangana High Court
WP/39628/2014 of Uday Vellamcheti Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.39628 of 2014 ORDER: The petitioners 1 to 4 herein alleged that at the instance of the fourth respondent, respondent No.3 is allegedly harassed the petitioners threatening to arrest the petitioners. It is stated that there is a matrimonial
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKARWRIT PETITION No.39628 of 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioners 1 to 4 herein alleged that at the instance ofthe fourth respondent, respondent No.3 is allegedly harassed thepetitioners threatening to arrest the petitioners. It is stated thatthere is a matrimonial dispute pending between the first petitionerand fourth respondent and as per the complaint filed by the fourthrespondent, the third respondent called both the parties on 02-12-2014 for the purpose of counseling. However, the petitionersalleged that they are being threatened that they would be arrested.Hence, they have filed the present writ petition.
On instructions, Government Pleader for Home, however,says that on the complaint of fourth respondent, DeputyCommissioner of Police, Detective Department, C.C.S.,Hyderabad, endorsed directing the third respondent to call both theparties and counsel them. Accordingly, counseling was undertakenby the third respondent on 02-02-2014.
Subsequently there was third round of counseling had takenplace on 20-12-2014. On which date both the parties appeared andthe fourth respondent showed willingness to live with her husbandbut the first petitioner is stated to be seeking a divorce. Hence,both the parties were let of without registering any case andadvised them to settle their issues amicably. Except thecounseling as aforesaid the third respondent stated that they havenot taken any further action in the matter and as on today no case is registered against the petitioners. However, in future if anycomplaint of cognizable offence is filed, appropriate action will betaken.
Hence, evidently, except the counseling sessionsundertaken by third respondent there is no other interference orthreats as alleged by the petitioners.
In view of the fact that apparently the writ petitioners areunable to substantiate their allegations, hence, the writ petition isdismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, in this writ petitionshall stand closed.
December 30, 2014PN
____________________________
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Pn
WRIT PETITION No.39628 of 2014
December 30, 2014