Telangana High Court

SA/810/2007 of Madineni Nagayya Vs Balireddi Varahalamma on 30 December 2014

Cites 0, Cited by 0

S. RAVI KUMAR SECOND APPEAL No.810 of 2007 JUDGMENT: No representation is made on behalf of appellant though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that appellant is not interested to prosecute this case. 2. Hence, second appeal is dismissed for non-

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR

SECOND APPEAL No.810 of 2007

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT:

No representation is made on behalf of appellantthough the matter is listed under the caption ‘fordismissal’. It seems that appellant is not interested toprosecute this case.

2. Hence, second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

3. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________

S. RAVI KUMAR, J

30[th] December 2014.mar

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead