Telangana High Court
WA/1316/2006 of Cheruku Mallikarjuna Rao Vs The A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd., on 22 December 2006
THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL NO. 1316 OF 2006 Between: Cheruku Mallikarjuna Rao & another ..... Appellants AND The A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd., Visakhapatnam rep. by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Visakhapatnam &
HON'BLE SHRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICEAND
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1316 OF2006
Between:
Cheruku Mallikarjuna Rao & another
AND
.....
Appellants
The A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd.,Visakhapatnam rep. by its Chairman-cum-ManagingDirector, Visakhapatnam & others
.....Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
:: J U D G M E N T ::
Counsel for the appellants : Shri P. Narasimha RaoCounsel for the respondents : Shri K. MohanramiReddy Dated: 22.12.2006
Per G.S.SINGHVI, CJ
This appeal is directed against order dated08.09.2005 passed by the learned Single Judge in WritPetition No.19750 of 2005, whereby he rejected theappellants’ challenge to order dated 24.04.2005 passedby the Divisional Engineer (Operations), A.P.E.P.D.C.L.,Amalapuram, East Godavari District.
After arguing the case at length, learned counsel forthe appellants made a request that his clients may bepermitted to withdraw the appeal with liberty to seekreview of the order under challenge.
Learned counsel for the respondents says that hedoes not have any objection.
In view of the above, the writ appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made.
As a sequel to dismissal of the writ appeal,W.A.M.P.No.2789 of 2006 filed by the appellants forinterim relief is also dismissed.
G.S.SINGHVI, CJ
22.12.2006ksld
G.V. SEETHAPATHY, J