Telangana High Court

WP/27869/2005 of Chitikela Appala Naidu, Vs The Government of the State of Andhra Pradesh, on 29 December 2005

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.27869 of 2005 Date:29.12.2005 Between: Chitikela Appala Naidu --------PETITIONER The Government of State of A.P. and others ---------RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner filed a revision before the Government, against the order dated 22.10.2005 passed

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY

W.P.No.27869 of 2005

Date:29.12.2005

Between:

Chitikela Appala Naidu

--------PETITIONER

The Government of State of A.P. and others

---------RESPONDENTS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The petitioner filed a revision before the Government, against the order dated22.10.2005 passed by the Additional Agent to Government, Rampachodavaram inC.M.A.No.103 of 2005. The petitioner states that he filed an application for stay andcomplains that no orders have been passed by the Government so far.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader forSocial Welfare.

It is not known as to whether the petitioner presented the revision within the period oflimitation, or whether the application for stay has been pursued with the neededvigour.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined togrant any positive or specific orders except that the first respondent be directed todispose of the application for stay, within a period of four weeks.

Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider andpass appropriate orders in the application filed by the petitioner for interim orders,within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereshall be no order as to costs.

________________

29.12.2005

kdl

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead