Telangana High Court
WP/27914/2005 of S.Kalavathi Vs The District Collector, Anantapur District on 29 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO.27914 OF 2005 DATED:29.12.2005 Between: S. Kalavathi and others …Petitioners And The District Collector, Ananthapur District, Ananthapur and another …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO.27914 OF 2005
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.27914 OF 2005
DATED:29.12.2005
Between:S. Kalavathi and othersAnd
The District Collector,Ananthapur District, Ananthapur and another …Petitioners …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
WRIT PETITION NO.27914 OF 2005
The petitioners claim that they have purchased land in S.No272, situated atAdarshnagar, Ananthapur, in 1988. As there was some disputes between petitionersand third parties, they made an application to second respondent seekingcomprehensive survey duly paying requisite amount of Rs.100/-. Though suchapplication was made in January, 2004, no action was taken. Therefore, presentWrit Petition is filed.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Revenue (General).
The petitioners purchased the property in layout No.299/83 of Ananthapur, whichpre-supposes that the land in S.No.272 ceased to be agricultural land. Therefore, asper the provisions of A.P.Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923, second respondent orsurvey officer cannot resolve the boundary dispute. If so advised, the petitioner mayfile appropriate suit for declaration against those third parties who are raising disputeregarding boundaries of the layout. In this Writ Petition, no relief can be granted tothe petitioner.
The Writ Petition with the above observations is accordingly disposed of.
_______________
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
29.12.2005bnr