Telangana High Court
WP/32721/2010 of M/s. Preesteels AND Fabrication Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its on 31 December 2010
R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32721 of 2010 Date: 31.12.2010 Between : M/s. Preesteels & Fabrication Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad. … Petitioner and The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Transport, R & B
Date: 31.12.2010
Between :
M/s. Preesteels & Fabrication Pvt. Ltd.,Rep.by its Managing Director,Sanathnagar, Hyderabad.
… Petitioner
and
The Government of Andhra Pradesh,Rep.by its Principal Secretary,Transport, R & B Department,Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others.
… Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER :
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as thelearned Government Pleader for Finance and Planning and also thelearned Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings.
2. This writ petition is filed with the prayer, which reads as under:“……Writ of Mandamus by declaring the inaction of therespondents in complying with G.O.Ms.No.123 Transport, R &B (RI) Department, dated 23.8.2010 as illegal, arbitrary and inviolation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and pass ……”
3. With reference to a dispute on the works executed by thepetitioner, arbitration proceedings were initiated. Referring to the order ofthis Court, dated 8.6.2007, there was a conciliation on the claim of thepetitioner and the dispute was resolved by agreeing to pay an amount of Rs.43,30,000/- towards final settlement for the work of “Construction ofHLB across Kinnerasani River at km 54/2 of Yellandu-Bhadrachalamroad” to the petitioner. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of thepetitioner that inspite of the said settlement entered into on 23.8.2010,the said amount has not been paid to the petitioner.
4. When the matter came up for admission on 27.12.2010 and30.12.2010, the same was adjourned to enable the learned GovernmentPleader to obtain instructions in the matter.
5. Today, on instructions, it is submitted by the learnedGovernment Pleader that the respondents will pay the amount settledand are taking steps for expeditious implementation of the orders issuedby the Government in G.O.Ms.No.123, Transport, Roads and Buildings(R.I) Department, dated 23.8.2010.
6. In that view of the matter, inasmuch as it is stated that therespondents are already taking steps for payment of the amount settled,the writ petition is disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction tothe respondents to pay the amount, which is agreed to be paid as perG.O.Ms.No.123, Transport, Roads and Buildings (R.I) Department, dated23.8.2010, to the petitioner, within a period of two months from today.There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________________________
JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY31.12.2010.Msr