Telangana High Court
CC/293/2017 of Mirjaguda Gram Panchayat, Vs Sri M.Raghunandan Rao, IAS, on 29 December 2023
No.293 0F 2017 contempt case fired under Sections 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act to summon the Respondent herein and punish him for wirfury and deriberatery disobeying the orders passed by this The Honorable High court in w.p No.7037 of 2014 dated 01.02.2016 BETWEEN: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CONTE M PT CASE No.293 0F 2017
contempt case fired under Sections 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act tosummon the Respondent herein and punish him for wirfury and deriberaterysummon the Respondent herein and punish him for wirfury and deriberaterydisobeying the orders passed by this The Honorable High court in w.p No.7037of 2014 dated 01.02.2016of 2014 dated 01.02.2016
BETWEEN:
Mirjaguda Gram Panchayat,, Kumar s/o vittataiah. aried"35 _ [Mirjaguda, ][Rep. ][by ][its ]Sarpanch [p.Sanieev]i;!;i-n," iirid.ijiri"i,i'iIt'jlrol Vit'lii"lShankarpali Mandat, narisa nedo'y Di#i"itocj bz"sl "i;!;i-n," iirid.ijiri"i,i'iIt'jlrol Vit'lii"lShankarpali Mandat, narisa nedo'y Di#i"itocj bz"sl "
...PETITIONERY PETITIONER
AND
Sri M.Raghunandan Rao. lAS, District Collector, Ranga Reddy District atHyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT NO.2
Counsel for the petitionerCounsel for the RespondentThe Court made the following: OrderThe Court made the following: Order : Sri. V Ravi Kiran Rao : GP for Revenue THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO
coNTEMPT CASENo.293of 2017
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The contempt case is filed
seeking to punish the respondent under Sections I0 to 12of the Contempt of CourtsAct, 1gZ1, for deliberate Act, 1gZ1, for deliberate andwillful disobedience ininimplementing the order passed by this Court in W.p.No.7O37of 2014, dated O1.02.2016.W.p.No.7O37of 2014, dated O1.02.2016.
2. Heard Srirepresenting Sri
Y.Neelakanta Reddy, Iearned
Iearnedcounselrepresenting SriV.Ravi Kiran Rao, learned counselfor thepetitioner and learned Assistant Government pleaderforRevenue appearing on behalf of respondent JLearned counsel for the petitioner submits that rnsprte of rnsprte ofspecific direction issued by this Court on 01.02.2016, rheissued by this Court on 01.02.2016, rherespondent not complied with the order
4. percontra,learned Assistant Government pleadersubmits that, therespondent considered the claim of thepetrtioner/Gram panchayat and allotted the revenue share in \
,I
)
respect of the land's allotted to the petitroner/Gram panchayatto a tune of Rs.56,64,798/- from 2OOt-2002 to 2016- 2017.
5. In view of the specific averments made by the respondentin para 6 of the counter affidavit, no further adjudicatio n isrequired.
6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, thepetitioner is granted liberty to avail the remedies as areavailable under law, if so advised.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
To,
so/-cH.VENKATESWARLU /DEPUW BEGISTRAR /a,/SECTION [OFFICER]
//TRUE COPY//
1. Sri M.Raghunandan [Rao, IAS' ][District Collector' Ranga Reddy District ][at]Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
Z. One CC [to SRl. ][V ][Ravi ][Kiran ][Rao, ][Advocate ][[OPUC]]
3. Two CCs [to GP ][FOR ][Revenue, High ][Court ][for the State ][of ][Telangana ][[OUT]]
4. Two CD [CoPies]
KMS
P^^2,.
HIGH COURTJSR, J
DATED: 29t12t2023
ORDER
1f-LANG*.=-cxl.*YasoulwI(.)Lt-t-f-(T-oo,*ia)\+
CC.No.293 of 2017
CLOSED THE CONTEMPT CASE
(^?-\\-\