Telangana High Court

CC/2228/2022 of S.K.G.Basha Vs Dr Nalin Shinghal and 3 others on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI CONTEMPT CASE No: 2228 OF 2022 Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to Punish the Respondents herein for

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI

CONTEMPT CASE No: 2228 OF 2022

Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act toPunish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the HighCourt dated 24-08-2022 in W.P.No.2257812021.

Between:

S.K.G.Basha, S/o. lmam Hussain, aged about 57 years, Occ. BHEL R & DCasual worker, R/o .No.7-3-13, Ferozguda, Bowenpally Post, Secunderabad-S00011, T.S.

...Petltioner

AND

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Dr. Nalin Shinghal, The Chairman & Managing Director, BHEL CorporateOffice, 7th BHEL House, Siri Fort, New Delhi 110049.Office, 7th BHEL House, Siri Fort, New Delhi 110049.

2. Sri Upinder Singh Matharu, The Directo(HR), BHEL Corporate Office, BHELHouse, Siri Fort, New Delhi 110049.House, Siri Fort, New Delhi 110049.

3. Sri Jai Prakash Srivastava, The Director(R & D), BHEL Corporate Office,BHEL House, Siri Fort, New Delhi 110049.BHEL House, Siri Fort, New Delhi 110049.

4. Sri K. Ravi Shanker, The Executive Director, Bharat Heavy ElectricalsLimited, Corporate R & D Division, Vikasnagr, Hyderabad-S0O 093, T.S.Limited, Corporate R & D Division, Vikasnagr, Hyderabad-S0O 093, T.S.

...Respondents Nos. 1 to 4.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. T. KISHTAIAH

Counsel for the Respondents: CH. SAMSON BABU

The Court made the folkcwing: ORDER

THE HOII'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHL'i,'I I)EVI

C()NTEMPT CASE No.2228 of 2Ot it.

Q&D-EB:

The Conte mpt Case is filed alleging wilful clisobedienceof the order cf this Court in W.P.No.22578 cl.2O2 1 dated24.O8.2O22 lry the respondents and to trrunish therespondents fr r the same.

2. Learned c)unsel for the petitioner subrril.s :hat thisCourt had c irected the petitioner to mirl:e a freshrepresentation an<l directed the respondents tc <:onsider the- sarne again in accordance-with the directrons ol ttLe Court.It is submitte I that the respondents have r,:plied to therepresentation of tlle petitioner by letter ctated 15.11.2022.However, the reply of the respondents is nol as per thespirit and ten,>r of the direction of this Court. Therefore,according to hirn, the respondents have committedcontempt of th s Court.

3. However, this Court finds that the dire<:iion of thisCourt was or ly to consider the representzrt.ion of thepetitioner in a ocordance with the scheme lrerlred by the

2

PMO,]C.C.tto .2228 of 2022

respondents for regularization . of the services of theThe have of theemployees, respondents disposed representation and therefore it cannot be considered aswilful disobedience on the part of the respcndents. Horvever,if the petitioner1Saggrieved by the response of therespondents, then the same can be challenged by thepetitioner in appropriate proceedings.

4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. Thereshall be no order as to costs.

MisdellaiiecjriS applications, if any pending, shall alsostand closed.

Sd/. CH. VENKATESWARLUDEPUW REGISTRAR('-+v.'r---\- r)'

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. One CC to SRl. CH. SAI4SON [BABU, ][Advocate ][OPUC]

2. One CC to SRl. T. KISHTAIA!-|, Advocate IOPUCI

3. Two CD Copies

PSR \.P

HIGH COUR--PMD,JDATED:3011i 12422

.',:'rt!Ct-{Nr:Ja/1!J=-:r'tc,ICQORDER>r H$)\i:=:-:2'CC.No.222B cf 2422

DISMISSING l'HE: CONTEMPT CASE.-22\:r13/.-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead