Telangana High Court
CRLA/1038/2002 of Dappu Gopal, Vs The State of A.P.,Through Circle Inspector of Police, on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE: BILAL NAZKI AND THE HON`BLE MR. JUSTICE: CH. S.R.K.PRASAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1038 OF 2002 (Criminal Appeal under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR: PRESENT:THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE: BILAL NAZKIANDTHE HON`BLE MR. JUSTICE: CH. S.R.K.PRASAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1038 OF 2002
(Criminal Appeal under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C. filed against thejudgment dated: 26-07-1999 passed IN S.C. NO. 17 OF 1998 by theCourt of the Principal Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District atSaroornagar, Hyderabad)
Between:
Dappu Gopal, S/o. Balaiah, C.T. NO. 1416, Central Prison, Cherlapalli.
AND
Appellant/Accused
The State of A.P., through Circle Inspector of Police, Vikarabad.
Respondent
The Criminal Appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Appealand Memo of Grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.Arvindu Maturi, Advocate for the Appellant and the Public Prosecutor, for therespondent, the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
“When the record was summoned from Prl. Sessions Court, RangaReddy District, while forwarding the Proceeding Sheets, Port MortemReport and a Judgment, it was stated as follows:
“As per the directions of Prl. District Judge, Ranga ReddyDistrict, the Part-II papers are destroyed”.
The record does not show as to when the orders were passed bythe Prl. District Judge, and who was the District Judge at the relevantpoint of time.
Therefore, the Prl. District Judge, Ranga Reddy District shallinform this Court, whether any order was passed by Prl. District Judgefor destruction of records, and if so, he shall send the order to thisCourt, and if it is not traceable, then he shall inform as to who was thePrl. District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at the time when the recordswere destroyed”.
The order shall be communicated on telephone so that the replyis available to this Court by next date. List on Monday i.e on 29-11-2004”.
SD/- MD. IBRAHIMASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
1. T h e Prl. District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Saroornagar,Hyderabad. (BY FAX AND SPECIAL MESSENGER with a copy ofpetition and grounds)Hyderabad. (BY FAX AND SPECIAL MESSENGER with a copy ofpetition and grounds)
2. The District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad.3. T h e Registrar (Judicial), High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (for kindperusal)3. T h e Registrar (Judicial), High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (for kindperusal)
4. One spare copy.
Ksv
HIGH COURT
BNJ&CHSRKPJ
DATE: 23-11-2004
NOTE: LIST ON MONDAY i.e. 29-11-2004
ORDER
CRL.A. No. 1038 OF 2002