Telangana High Court
WP/7852/2003 of Sri Raja Rajeswari Paper Mills Ltd., Vs The Authority under payment of wages Act. on 24 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WPMP NO.36657 OF 2008 AND WRIT PETITION Nos.7852 of 2003 Between: M/s.Sree Raja
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER,TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY
PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WPMP NO.36657 OF 2008ANDWRIT PETITION Nos.7852 of 2003
Between:M/s.Sree Raja Rajeswari Paper Mills Ltd.,Bapulapadu, Near Hanuman Junction,Krishna District, reptd., by its Chairman-Sri V.C.Janardan Rao.
… Petitioner
And
The Authority under Payment of Wages Act-Cum-Dy. Commissioner of Labour,Eluru Zone, Eluru, West Godavari District andSeven others.
… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners : Sri V.Hari Haran Counsel for respondents : Sri V.Raghu for R.3.
None for R.1,R.2,R.4 to
R.8.
This Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantiverelief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction, more in the nature ofwrit of certiorari calling for the records in I.A No.10 of2000 in I.A.No.6 of 2000 in PW.No.4 of 2000 on the fileof the 1[st] respondent-Dy. Commissioner of Labour,Zone-II, Eluru, W.G.Dist., and quash the order dated 20-11-2002 as being passed arbitrarily, illegal andunjustified and without reasonable opportunity ofhearing and hence suffers from the vice of Art.14 ofConstitution of India and consequently direct the 1[st]respondent to number and hear the application of thepetitioner to set aside the order dated 12-6-2000 inP.W.No.4 of 2000 and dispose of the same inaccordance with law”.
The petitioner filed WPMP No.36657 of 2008 with theprayer to dispose of the Writ Petition in terms of memorandumof settlement dated Nil-11-2008. I have perused the joint memofiled on behalf of the petitioner and workmen, signed by theparties and their respective counsel, and also the memorandumof settlement entered into between the parties.
At the hearing, Sri V.Hari Haran, learned counsel for thepetitioner and Sri V.Raghu, learned counsel for respondentNo.3, submitted that the Writ Petition may be disposed of inaccordance with the said settlement. In view of this submissionof the learned counsel for the parties, the Writ Petition isdisposed of in terms of settlement dated Nil-11-2008 with thedirection that the said settlement shall form part of the record of this Writ Petition.
As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP
No.10221 of 2003 is disposed of as infructuous.
Date:24.12.2008MNR
__________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J