Telangana High Court
WP/27885/2005 of Sk.Akthar Begum Vs The Sub Inspector of Police, on 29 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.27885 OF 2005 Dated: 29-12-2005 Between Sk. Akthar Begum, W/o. Sk. Jameel Basha, R/o. Gajula Street, Venkatagiri Town, Nellore District and another. …PETITIONERS AND The Sub-Inspector of Police, Venkatagiri Police Station, Venkatagiri Town,
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No.27885 OF 2005
Dated: 29-12-2005
Between
Sk. Akthar Begum, W/o. Sk. Jameel Basha, R/o. Gajula Street, Venkatagiri Town, Nellore District and another.
…PETITIONERS
AND
The Sub-Inspector of Police, VenkatagiriPolice Station, Venkatagiri Town, NelloreDistrict.
…RESPONDENT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Petitioners seeks a Writ of Mandamus to declare action of the respondent in summoningthem to the police station at the instance of the creditors of the first petitioner’s husband,threatening them to execute the promotes in the creditors and in interfering with theirpersonal life and liberty as illegal and arbitrary.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the husband of the first petitioner tookcertain loans from certain persons but the same has not been repaid. Therefore, at the instance of the creditors of the husband of the first petitioner the respondent is pressurizingthe petitioners to execute the pronotes in favour of the creditors.
The second respondent, who is the son-in-law of the first petitioner, is also threatened andpressurized by the respondent though he is not due and payable any amounts to thecreditors.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondent is directed not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitionersand not to summon them to the police station without there being any report/complaintalleging that the petitioners have committed a cognizable offence.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
______________
V. ESWARAIAH, J