Telangana High Court
WP/40350/2012 of Mohammed Abdul Muqtadar, Vs The Commissioner AND Director of School Education, on 31 December 2012
L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.40350 of 2012 ORDER: The petitioner is the owner of premises bearing No.19-2- 21/11/F, situated at Indiranagar, Tadbun, Hyderabad. It was leased to Government for running Government High School. The Government accorded permission for payment of rent for the
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYWRIT PETITION No.40350 of 2012
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner is the owner of premises bearing No.19-2-21/11/F, situated at Indiranagar, Tadbun, Hyderabad. It was leased toGovernment for running Government High School. The Governmentaccorded permission for payment of rent for the building at the rate ofRs.7,930/- per month. The lease has been renewed from time to timetill 2011. Subsequently, the District Educational Officer, 3[rd]respondent herein, enhanced the rent at the rate of Rs.25,474/- for themonth of March 2011, in the year 2011. By renewing the lease fromMarch 2011 to February 2013 the 3[rd] respondent executed a leasedeed enhancing the rent from 25,474/- to Rs.38,000/-. This was alsoaffirmed by the 3[rd] respondent through proceedings dated 09-03-2012. The petitionersubmits that the 3[rd] respondent was due payment of rents since 1997till February 2011, October 2011 to February 2012 and April, May,September, October, November and December 2012. He submitted arepresentation in this regard and prays for appropriate directions.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learnedGovernment Pleader for Education.
3. The petitioner filed a copy of the proceedings dated 09-03-2012 issued by the 3[rd] respondent. It is clearly mentioned thatrent at the rate of Rs.38,000/- per month is sanctioned for the periodreferred to above. There was delay in payment of rents for theaforementioned period. The very purpose of giving the premises onlease is to earn some income.
4. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing therespondents herein to ensure that the rents for the building owned by the petitioner, which is leased to the Government to run High school,are paid up to date within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. The miscellaneous petition filed in this writ petition shall alsostand disposed of.
____________________
L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.
December 31, 2012.KTL