Telangana High Court
WP/40261/2012 of Mr.M.Venkateswara Rao, Vs The Joint Sub-Registrar, on 31 December 2012
Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.40261 of 2012 Dated 31.12.2012 Between: Mr.M.Venkateswara Rao and another …Petitioners And The Joint Sub-Registrar, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam and another. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri VV.Satish Counsel for
The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.40261 of 2012
Between:
Dated 31.12.2012
Mr.M.Venkateswara Rao and another
…Petitioners
And
The Joint Sub-Registrar,
Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam and another.
…Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner: Sri VV.Satish Counsel for the respondents: GP for Revenue The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
This Writ Petition is filed for the followingsubstantive relief:
“to issue any writ, order or directionmore particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the 1[st]Respondent in not registering the saletransactions of the Petitioner over their Plotson the basis of a letter, dated 12-04-2012,issued by the 2[nd] Respondent is illegal,arbitrary and contrary to the provisions ofRegistration Act and one without jurisdictionand to consequently direct the 1stRespondent to register the sale transactionsin Plot Nos.1 and 4 in Sy.Nos.130/1-A Part &130/2-A Part and Plot Nos.3 and 4 inSy.Nos.332 & 332 Part of MadhurawadaVillage, Visakhapatnam Rural, VisakhapatnamDistrict of the Petitioners respectively.”
At the hearing, it is agreed among the learnedCounsel for both the parties that the issues raised in thisWrit Petition are squarely covered in favour of thepetitioners by Order, dated 12.12.2012, inW.P.No.23217 of 2012.
In view of the same, this Writ Petition is allowed interms of the above-mentioned Order, dated 12.12.2012, in W.P.No.23217 of 2012, with the direction that thereasons and the directions contained therein shall formpart of this order.
As a sequel, WPMP.No.51094 of 2012, filed forinterim relief, is disposed of as infructuous.
______________________
(C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J)
31[st] December, 2012 lur