Telangana High Court
WP/12483/2003 of Naragana Suresh S/o. late Bapiraju Vs The Government of A.P., Department of on 28 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 12483 of 2003 Between: Naragana Suresh S/o. late Bapiraju R/o. Veeravasaram, West
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO
WRIT PETITION NO : 12483 of 2003
Between:
Naragana Suresh S/o. late Bapiraju
R/o. Veeravasaram, West Godavari District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Government of A.P., Department of Higher Education, Rep. by itsSecretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2 The Commissioner/Director of Intermediate Education, A.P., Hyderabad.
3 The District Collector, West Godavari District, Eluru.
4 VEC Junior College, Veeravasaram, rep. by its President and Correspondent, Veeravasaram, West Godavari District. Veeravasaram, West Godavari District.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaringthe proceedings in D.Dis. 5854/2000 (A3) dt. 12-7-2000 and the proceedings inL.Dis.9454/2000 (A3) dt. 12-11-2000 issued by the 3rd respondent and the action ofthe respondents in not appointing the petitioner as typist in the 4th respondentcollege on compassionate grounds by considering my case taking intoconsideration the clarifications issued in G.O.Ms.No. 612, General Administration(Services-A) department, dt. 30-10-1991 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional andissue consequential directions to the respondents to appoint him as typist in the 4threspondent college on compassionate grounds with all consequential benefits.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.CHIDAMBARAM
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Mr. D.V. Sitarama Murthy The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard the counsel on either side and with their consent the writpetition itself is taken up for disposal.
The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition is to considerhis case for compassionate appointment. Since this court inW.P.M.P.No.15519 of 2003 granted interim direction on 10.11.2003,the petitioner had already been appointed on compassionategrounds.
In view of the same, no orders need be passed in this writpetition. No order as to costs.
28.12.2004
CVM
To,
1 The Government of A.P., Department of Higher Education, Rep. by itsSecretary, Secretariat,Hyderabad.
2 The Commissioner/Director of Intermediate Education, A.P., Hyderabad.
3 The District Collector, West Godavari District, Eluru.
4. 2 CCs to G.P. for High Education, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (OUT).
5. 2 CD copies.