CRP/3811/2014 of Smt. Pollavarapu Naga Padma Vs Sri D.V.Subba Rao on 31 December 2020

\

I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF [TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF [DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. [SRI ][DEVI]

CIVIL REVISION PETITION[NO: 3811 ][OF ][2][014]

Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of [lndia, ][against ][the ][Order]dated.28.03.2014 Made [in ]o.s [No. ][50'.l ][0f 2006, ][on ][the ][file ][of ][the ][court ][of ][the ][Motor]Accident Tribunal-cum-Xl Additional [District ][Judge, (FTC), ][Ranga Reddy ][District*},-]

L, I\ [.No.fto:r,]

Between:

L/

Smt. PollavaraPu [Nagal ][Padry;q. ]-W/o.Late P.Ragahva [Rao,]Aged about 58 Years, [Occ: ][Household,]RJo.h-lat No.4O5, [4th ][Floor, ][Sai Tiruma-la]Residence Street [No'9, ][Lane No'9,]Beirind Sentence [College,]Tamaka, Secunderabad.

. -Revision [Petitioner/ ][Petitioner]' lDefendant [No.l]

AN

D

1Sri.D.V. Subba [Rao, ][S ]/ [o'Late ][D. ][Seetharamaiah,]Aged abcut [70 ]Years,R7o.H.No.37 [-931357 ]/ [1, ][Road No'4,]X,f.pr..- [[P'O. ][Madhura ]][[Madhura ]]2Sri.V.M.Venkatesh, [S ]/ [o. ][Sri. ][V'A'Mohan,]Aged about 39 Years,Rlo.H.No.9S, SBI [Sta-ff ][Colony, ][New ][Bkaram,]Gandhi Nagar [Post, ][HYdera-bad-80]JSri.B.Venkatesh, [[S/ ][o.Late ][Sri.B.J'Sastry,]][[o.Late ][Sri.B.J'Sastry,]][[Sri.B.J'Sastry,]]

X,f.pr..- [[P'O. ][Madhura ]][[Madhura ]][Nrlgar Colony, Secunderabad']

Sri.B.Venkatesh, [[S/ ][o.Late ][Sri.B.J'Sastry,]][[o.Late ][Sri.B.J'Sastry,]][[Sri.B.J'Sastry,]]about [63 ][years, ][Occ: ][Retired ][Employee,]Aged R/o.FI.llo.37, [SBI Staff ][ColouY,]New Bakaram, [Gandhi ][Naga,r, ][Post ][Hyderabad-8O']

Sri.Desikan Mukund, [S/ ][o.Sri'T'N'V'Desikan,]Aged about [46 ]Years, [Occ: ][Service,]Nath [Krupa, ][V.N'Purretm ][Marg, ][(opp' ][ATI)]Rjo.S, Cirunna Bhattio [Mumbai: ][4()O2 O22,]

4\II)

S.rrr./jPriya [Raghavan ][Mul<l<r'Lnd, ][W ][/ ][o' ][Sri' ][D ][esikan ][Mukundm']!Rged aUout [37 ]Years, [Occ: ][Houseu'ife, ]Rjo.S, Nath [Kripa, ][V.N'Puram ][Marg, (Opp' ][ATI)]Chunna Bhattio [Mumbai: 4002 ][O22']

( r-)

I

I

-2-6Smt.P.Kalyani, W/o.Sri.P.Janardhal Sastry,Aged about 55 years, Occ: I{ousehold,R/ o.A2, Potti Sri Ramulu Nagar, Masab Tank,Hyderabad.7Smt.Challa Venkata Padmini, W/o.Sri.C.A.Sastry,Aged about 46 years,R/o.8-6/58, Raja Hari Chandra Road, Varnasi,Uttar PradeshBMiss Lucy Gladys Devamboo, D/o.James Devamboo,Aged about 7O years, Occ: F-etired Government Servant,R/o.D.No.67-2-2F, cW Colony, Ashok Nagar, Kakinada9Smt.Sangana Anjana Devi, W/o.Late Sri.Venkateshwar Rao,Aged about 75 years, Occ: Housewife,R/o.101, Santi Apartments, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad .Ii0.Smt.Rachamalla Pushpavalli, W/ o. Sri.R;Venkateshlu,Aged about 63 years, Occ: Household,Rlo.2-40-11, Sector 10, MVP Colony,Visakhapatnatn- 17Respondent Nos.3 to 10 are Rep. by their GpA holderSri.D.V.Subba Rao, who is the Respondent No.1 herein11Smt.Dr.Challareddy Krishna Vema, W/o.Sri.T.Bheem Reddy,Aged about 42 years, Occ: Rusiness,R/o.3-5-20, Ram Kote, Hyderabad.12. Sri.C.Narsimila Reddy, S/o.Late Sri. Veera Reddy,Aged about 65 years, Occ: Agriculture,R / o. Appaj iguda, H amle t of Chilkur Gra r,Er panchayat,Moinabad Mandal, R.R.Dist.i3. Sri.A.Venkat Reddy, S/o. Not known, IAged about 50 years, Occ: Elusiness, :R/o.Chilkur, Moinabad Mandal,Ranga Reddy District.Respondent Nos.11 to 13 are not necessary.parties to thispetitionlJarrirr!.rlr -_-\-.-.- ,....Respondents/plaintiffs/Defendants!LA. NO:1 OF014(CRPMP. NO:5203 0F 2014)Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to stay of all furtherproceedings in o.S No. 501 of 2006 on the flle of Motor Accident claims Tribunat- I

cum-Xl Additional District [Judge, ][(FTC), ][Ranga Reddy District, Pending disposal ][of]the main Revision [in ][the ][interest of Justice.]

Counsel for the [Petitioner: ][M/s NAZIR AHMED KHAN]

Counsel [for the Respondent ][Nos' ][1 ][to ][10: SRI ][N' ][SIVA REDDY]

Counsel [for the ][Respondent ][Nos' ]['t ][1 ][to ][13: ][NONE ][APPEARED]

The Court [made ][the ][following: ][ORDER]

oRDEII

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

c lvl l_ Rl.j\/1SIONl, Fl'l't'l' 1(l \ \(),16i I ( )ir 2u I-t

Lc.a rn c.cl counsc.l lor the petitioner u,oulcl subn,ritth:r t tllCcause in this revision does not survive further adjudication ancl thcrevrsion has become inlructuousrevrsion has become inlructuous In that vicu. of the matte r, recording the said submission, tht,Civil Revision petition is dismissed as inll-uctuous. ThcrL_ shall h,.no ort-1er as to costs.

Ntljsceilaneous applicatioits,if any, pending shall stalrdclislnisscrl.

iI

SD/. I.NAGALAKSHMIASSISTANT REGISTRAi.\ ,- SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY'

To,'(\.'r- cl.olr"-^rn^,SECTION OFFICERDistrict Judge, (Frc), Ransa2. ] {:i".!!::f:ilfifr1'":li.!a'cum-xrAdditionar One CC to Sri Nazir Ahmed Khan, Advocate tOpUCl? 9n" [CC ][to Sri ][N ][Siva ][Reddy, ]Ad;".;i;io;J;f [""]4 Two CD Copiesq-- HIGH COURT

GSDJDATEO:3111212020

ORDERCRP.No.381 1 ol 2014

R{HEsI,qkoo.JoF!)2A Jwzfl?/ttioI';/.L/tc.

DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION [AS ][INFRUCTUOUS]WITHOUT COSTS

\[\+]