Telangana High Court
CRLRC/1716/2003 of Satish Kumar Kuna Vs Smt. P.Lekha on 28 December 2007
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T. MEENA KUAMRI CRL.R.C. No. 1716 OF 2003 Between: Satish Kumar Kuna, S/o. K. Ramalingaiah Petitioner And 1. Smt. P. Lekha, W/o. P. Muninder Reddy,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN: PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T. MEENA KUAMRI
CRL.R.C. No. 1716 OF 2003
Between:
Satish Kumar Kuna, S/o. K. Ramalingaiah
Petitioner
And
1. Smt. P. Lekha, W/o. P. Muninder Reddy, R/o. MIG, B-50, Dr. A.S. RaoNagar, Hyderabad.Nagar, Hyderabad.
2. The State of A.P., rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad Respondents Petition under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to revise the Order of theCourt of the V Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Ranga ReddyDistrict at L.B. Nagar, made in Crl.A.No.136 of 2001, dated 11-8-2003, preferred against the order of the Court of the Additional Judicial First ClassMagistrate, East and North, Ranga Reddy District Courts Complex, at L.BNagar made in C.C.No.781 of 1999, dated 11-10-2001.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the memoof grounds filed herein, and the order of the High Court dated 8-1-2004 made inCrl.MP.No.8014 of 2003, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Javed RazackAdvocate for the Petitioner and of Sri. K. Lakshman, Advocate for the RespondentNo.1, and of the Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.2, the Court made thefollowing
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
“It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that anamount of Rs.1,50,000/- has been paid under proper acknowledgment, a copy of which has been produced before this Court.
In this regard, Sri K. Lakshman, the learned counsel for the 1[st]respondent submitted that he has received the amount on behalf of the1[st] respondent and issued the receipt to that effect.
At this stage, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks towaive the balance amount of Rs.1,20,000/- payable to the 1[st]respondent, for which, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the1[st] respondent resisted the same, however, he seeks time to get theinstructions.
Post next week.”
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The V Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Ranga ReddyDistrict at L.B. Nagar, HyderabadDistrict at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad
2. The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, East and North, RangaReddy District Courts Complex, at L.B Nagar, HyderabadReddy District Courts Complex, at L.B Nagar, Hyderabad
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)
4. One CC to Sri Javed Razack, Advocate (OPUC)
5. One Spare Copy
KK
HIGH COURT
TMKJ
DT. 1-8-2007
NOTE: POST NEXT WEEK
ORDER
CRL.RC.NO. 1716 OF 2003
DIRECTION
Drafted by: KKDrafted on: 4-8-2007
HIGH COURT
TMKJ
NOTE: POST NEXT WEEK
ORDER
CRL.RC.NO. 1716 OF 2003