Telangana High Court
WP/33785/2010 of S.G. Sarada Vs The Superintendent of Police on 31 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33549 of 2010 Date: 31.12.2010 Between : Brother Maurice … Petitioner And The State of A.P., rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI
Date: 31.12.2010
Between :
Brother Maurice
… Petitioner
And
The State of A.P., rep.by itsPrincipal Secretary,Revenue Department,Secretariat Buildings,Hyderabad and others.
… Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well asthe learned Government Pleader for Revenue.
2. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner thatinspite of filing an appeal on 27.7.2010 before the 3[rd] respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Ranga ReddyDistrict, against the order in Memo No.B/36/2010, dated 15.5.2010,passed by the Tahsildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, SerilingampallyMandal, Ranga Reddy District, the said appeal is not being disposed
3. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned GovernmentPleader for Revenue that the appeal filed by the petitioner on27.7.2010 is pending consideration before the 3[rd] respondent.
4. In view of the said submission, inasmuch as the appealwas filed on 27.7.2010 and is pending consideration before theappellate authority, the writ petition is disposed of, at the admissionstage, directing the 3[rd] respondent-appellate authority to dispose ofthe appeal filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible,preferably within a period of two months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice of hearing to allthe effected parties. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________________________
JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
31.12.2010(Msr)