Telangana High Court
WP/20505/2003 of CRESHE (Cenre for Rural Development Salvation for Vs The District Collector, Khammam on 31 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 20505 of 2003 Between: CRESHE (Cenre for Rural Development Salvation for Health and
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO : 20505 of 2003
Between:
CRESHE (Cenre for Rural Development Salvation for Health andEnvironment) 3-1-96/1, Sri Chaitanya Nagar, Behind CSI Church, IndiraNagar, Khammam, rep. by its Executive Director, P. Krishna Rao
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The District Collector, Khammam
2 The District Water Management Agency, rep. by its Project Director, Khammam
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly onein the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the order in Rc.No. A/2010/03dated 17-8-2003 of the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary andunconstitutional and consequently set aside the order in Rc.No.CC/122/SC/02 dated 17-8-2003 of the 1st respondent, Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.ADINARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No 1: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for Respondent No.2: G.P. for P.Raj & Rural Development.
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the writ petitionis dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
________________
G. ROHINI, J.
31[st] December, 2004
BJ/
To
1 The District Collector, Khammam
2 The Project Director, District Water Management Agency, Khammam
3. Two CCs. to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Bldgs., Hyderabad (OUT)4. Two CD copies.