Telangana High Court
WP/43326/2017 of Munavat Bichya Vs The State of Telangana on 29 December 2017
SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WP.No.43326 of 2017 ORDER : Heard the counsel for petitioners, and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondents. 2. The grievance of petitioners is that petitioners have preferred an appeal being B/ROR/1707/2009 before the 3rd respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
ORDER:
Heard the counsel for petitioners, and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondents.
2. The grievance of petitioners is that petitioners have preferred an appeal being B/ROR/1707/2009 before the 3[rd] respondent challenging order passed by the 4[th] respondent, and that the 3[rd] respondent is not disposing of the said appeal.
3. The learned Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondents, states that the 3[rd] respondent will dispose of the said appeal within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of copy of the order after giving notice to all affected parties, and communicate his decision thereon to petitioners.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 3[rd]respondent to dispose of the said appeal within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of copy of the order after giving notice to all affected parties, and communicate his decision thereon to petitioners. No order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
__________________________________
JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Date: 29.12.2017Ndr/*