Telangana High Court
CC/2546/2023 of Chirumalla Bhanu Prakash Vs Smt. Piyanka Reddy on 29 December 2023
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No :2546 0F 2023 ContemptCaseunderSectionsl0tol2ofContemptofCourtsActl9Tlto
IN THE HIGH [COURT ][FOR ][THE STATE OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE [TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND TWENTY THREE]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR]
CONTEMPT CASE [N]o[:2546 ][0F ][2023]
ContemptCaseunderSectionsl0tol2ofContemptofCourtsActl9TltoPunishtheRespondenthereinforwillfuldisobedienceoftheordersdated2S-09.2022 [in ][\N ][rit ][Petition ][No.376 ][50 ][of 2022']
Between:
Chirumalla [Bhanu Prakash, S/o- Late Rajanna, Aged about ][55 years' ][Occ:]
Business'R/o.BlockA,FlatNo.301,DyanushLakeFrontApartment'Manjeera [Water Pipe Line ][Road, Afeezpet, Hyderabad' Telangana State -]500 050.
...Petitioner
AND
Smt. Piyanka [Reddy, The Joint Sub- Registrar, Ramagundam, ][Oio ][Sub-]Registrar [at Peddapalli, Peddapalli District ][- ][505172']
...Contemnor/ResPondent
Counsel [for ][the ][Petitioner: ][Sri. ][VEERA SAVAN ][CHAKRAVARTHY DARA]
Counsel [for ][the ][Respondents: ][GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION]
The Court [made ][the ][following: ][ORDER]
l
RTHE[HON],BLE SRIJUSTI[CE ][N.][v.sH][RAVAN][ KUMA]
Contem[pt][ Case][ No.25][ 46of ][2023]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contemp! [case ][has been ][filed ][praying ][to ][punish]
the [respondent ][herein for ][deiiberate ][and ][wilful]disobedience [of ][the ][orders ][passed ][by the ][Court ][rn]W.P.No.3765 [O ][of ][2022 ][<lated ][2B'A9'2022']
2. ThisCourthaspassedthefollowinginterimorderin W.P.No.35 [670 ][of ][2022 ][daLed ][2B'Og ][2022 ][as ][follows:]
" Notice [before ][admtsson']
ISLearnecl [counsel ][lor ][LLe ][petitioner]todirected [to take ][out ][personal ][nottce]respondent [Nos'6 ][to ][18 and ][7 ][br| ][Regtstered]Post uith [Acknowledgment ][Due and ][file ][proof ][of]seruice [inthe ][Registry']
Post on [14'10'2022']
No.4In the [mearuuthile ]' [the ][resPondent]theshalL [consid-er ][the ][representation of]takepetitioners [dated ][10'06 ][2022 ][and]uithnecessary [action ][stictly ][in ][accordance]latu."
3. When the matterWhen the matter
3. When the matterWhen the matterrs taken up for hearing, learnedAssistant Government pleader lor Sr amps and Registra tionhas filed a counter affidavit stating that a document styledas "Canceliation Deed,,was presented before therespondent by the third party to take action in the matter.It is further submitted that respondent has also furnisheda suitable reply to the petitioner uid.eNo.I6l of 2023 dated,22.11.202s
4. The grievance of the petitioner is
of the petitioner the petitioner isthat Departmenthas no power to cancei a document thathas already beenregistered as Doc.No. 132/2022 underthe provisions ofRegistration Act, 190g, on a mererepresentation made bya third party who is not connectedto the document alreadyregistered. He would further submit that no documentstyled as tancellation deed, was presented as on the date.
5. [per ]contra, learned Assistant Government pieader would submit that the respondents has already given areply to the.petition,efrvide File No. 161 of 2O23and wouidthereford,submit that trrders of this Court in [* [__ ]W.p.No.3765O
I
of 2022 dated 28.09.2022 has been complied with andprays to close the contempt case.
6. At this, learned counsel for the petitioner wouldsubmit that he may be granted liberty to challenge theIetter in Lr.No.161l2023 dated 22.11.2023 issued by there spondent.
7. In view of the same, since the remedy is available to the petitioner to question the letter dated 22.11.2023 inthe pending writ petition, this Contempt Case standsclosed granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge theletter dated 22 .I I .2023 , if he is still aggrieved.
8. Recording the above said submissions, contemptcase stalds closed.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall standclosed. However there s all be no order as to costs.closed. However there s all be no order as to costs.
sd/- Ch.VenkateswarluDEPUTYGISTSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1One CC to Sri. VEERA SAVAN CHAKRAVARTHY DARA, Advocate 2tOpUCJIu',.Ti:?",ff"fflo"r1'"t [AND ][REGrsrRAroN ],Hish courr ror the2tOpUCJIu',.Ti:?",ff"fflo"r1'"t [AND ][REGrsrRAroN ],Hish courr ror the \k JTwo CD CopiesPSRPSR
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
ORDER
CC.No.2546 of 2023
CLOSING THE CONTEMTP CASE.
;1.':k,ki+'' " .i::i '
r-)1"'t_.,. ,.'(' ,-:oO2 [0 ][ilrH ][lilZ.f]()c