Telangana High Court
CRLP/15333/2013 of Rudraboina Sumathi Vs The State of AP., on 31 December 2013
R.KANTHA RAO CRL.P.No.15333 of 2013 ORDER The petitioners-A1 and A3 apprehend arrest in Cr.No.95 of 2013 of Kandukur Rural Police Station, Prakasam District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 506 read with 34 IPC and Section 3 (i) (x) of the Scheduled Castes &
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
ORDER
CRL.P.No.15333 of 2013
The petitioners-A1 and A3apprehend arrest inCr.No.95 of 2013 of Kandukur Rural Police Station,Prakasam District, registered for the offencespunishable under Sections 323, 506 read with 34 IPCand Section 3 (i) (x) of the Scheduled Castes &Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (forshort ‘the Act’).
Heard learned counsel appearing for thepetitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutorrepresenting the respondent-State.
In Crl.P.No.13655 of 2013, this Court whilerefusing to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners,specifically held that the allegations mentioned in theFirst Information Report would attract the ingredients of Section 3 (i) (x) of the Act.
In that view of the matter, it is not possible to takea different view on the same set of facts.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
_____________
R.KANTHA RAO,J
31[st] December, 2013rkkrkk