Telangana High Court
WP/36755/2021 of R.P.Singh and 5 others Vs The State of Telangana and 7 others on 30 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER Between: 1. R.P.Singh, S/o. late Ramchander Singh, Aged about 80 years,- Occ. Agricultire.are R/o. H.No.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIUBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
WRIT PETITION NO: 3675s OF 2021
Between:
1. R.P.Singh, S/o. late Ramchander Singh, [Aged ][about ][80 ][years,- ][Occ.]Agricultire.are R/o. H.No. [1-1 ], 1-2 and ['1-3' ][Peezadiguda, ][Medipally ][Mandal,]Medchal-Malkajgiri Distict.Agricultire.are R/o. H.No. [1-1 ], 1-2 and ['1-3' ][Peezadiguda, ][Medipally ][Mandal,]Medchal-Malkajgiri Distict.
2. Tej Pratap Singh, S/o. [late ][Ramchander ][Singh, Aged about ][62 years' ][occ']Agriculture.Agriculture.
3. Udai Pratap Singh' [S/o. late ][Phoolchand Singh, ][Aged about ][70 years' ][Occ']Agriculture.Agriculture.
4. Shamsher Singh, [S/o. late ][Deepchand ][Singh, ][Aged about ][60 ][years' ][occ']Agriculture.Agriculture.
5. Shyam Sunder [Singh' ][S/o. ][late ][Deepchand ][Singh' Aged about 55 ][years' ][Occ']Agriculture.Agriculture.
6. Anil Singh, [S/o. late Phool Chand ][Singh' ][Aged about 50 ][vears' ][Occ ][Agriculture']All are R/o. [n.ruo. ][ril'iYzl';e'i-;,"i%;tidi6uoi'-trlteol'pullv ][Mandal' ][Medchal-]Malkajgiri [Distict.]".PETITIONERSAll are R/o. [n.ruo. ][ril'iYzl';e'i-;,"i%;tidi6uoi'-trlteol'pullv ][Mandal' ][Medchal-]Malkajgiri [Distict.]".PETITIONERS
I
AND1 The State of Telangana' rep by its Principal Secretary to Revenue' B R K'B;;;;". Tank [Bun-d HYderabad']1 The State of Telangana' rep by its Principal Secretary to Revenue' B R K'B;;;;". Tank [Bun-d HYderabad']' 2. The B'ii.X:Ahr*an, State [of ][Telangana' ]Ta"nk Bund. [rep ]Hvderabad[by ][its ][Principal ][Secretary ][to ][M ][A ][& ][U D ][Department']3. ' rhe Comniissloner. Swarna Jayanthi Complex' [Hyd ][e ][rab ][rg ][y.?l': ][Deve ][lo ][p ][m ][ent ][Autho ][ritv' ]Ame([-;lr"?:'ff ]::lg'luluooo.u3. ' rhe Comniissloner. Swarna Jayanthi Complex' [Hyd ][e ][rab ][rg ][y.?l': ][Deve ][lo ][p ][m ][ent ][Autho ][ritv' ]Ame([-;lr"?:'ff ]::lg'luluooo.u
4. The District [Collector' Medchal-Malkajgiri District ][at ][Keesara']
5.TheRevenueDivisionalOfficer'KeesaraDivision'tvledchal-MalkajgiriDistrict'6 The Commissioner, [Peezadiguda ][Municipality' Medipally ][Mandal' ][Medchal-]"' N,rrrkiigiti District-500039'6 The Commissioner, [Peezadiguda ][Municipality' Medipally ][Mandal' ][Medchal-]"' N,rrrkiigiti District-500039'
7. The [Tahsildar, Medipally Mandal' Medchal-Malkaigiri District']
8. The [Station House ][officer, ][Medipally porice ][station, ][Medchal-Malkajgiri District']."RESPONDENTS."RESPONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybepleasedtoissue a [writ ][or ][order ][more ][particurarry ][one ][in ][the ][nature ][of ][writ ][of ][Mandamus]declaring [the ][action of ][the ][6th respondent' Commissioner' Peerzadiguda ][Municipality]in entertaining [building application ][or ][applications ][from ][any ][third ][part or ][third ][parties]onthebasisofcreatedandmanipulateddocumentsinspiteofpetitionersobjectionsandaStherearenoapprovedlayoutsinpetitionerslandinSy.Nos.l|o2lbyHMDAor DTCp [and ][not ][furnishing the ][information ][with ][regard ][to ][all ][the ][building permissions]sanctioned [in ][respect ][of ][land ][in ][Sy ][Nos' ][14 ][and ][15 ][in ][an ][area ][of ][Ac ][38-33 ][Gts]
situated at sararjung Kancha, parvathapur virage, Medipary Mandar, Medchar-Markajgiri District in spite of Judgment and Decree in o.s.No. 1.105 0f 2006,d' 15 06.2007 0n the fire of the Hon'bre r Additionar senior civir Judge, Ranga ReddyDistrict at L'B.Nagar as illegal, arbitrary and unlawful and against the Articles - 14, 19and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia.
IA NO 10 F 202.1
petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in 6th affidavit fired respondent in to support demorish of the the pelition, unauthorized constructions the High court the circumstances stated may be preased to direct in thetheand not to entertain extent buirding permission of Ac 38'33 Gts situated or permissions at Sararjung in respect Kancha, parvathapur of rand in Sy.Nos. 14 and 15 to anyanMandar, Medchar-ri/arkajgiri sanction in the District petitioners and tand furnish rorthwith pendins the detairs of buirding permission orVirage, Medipary;:[:?::: disposar or the above Counsel for the petitioners: SRt C.HANUMANTHA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,4,5,7: Gp FOR REVENUEGp FOR REVENUECounsel for the Respondto''' GP FoR MUNI.IPAL counsel ADMN. & ,RBAN DEV.for the Respono,"nt ant No.3: SRI V.NARASTMHA GOUD, SC for HMDAcounser for the Respondent No.6: sRr N.,RAVEEN counsel ADMN. & ,RBAN DEV.for the Respono,"nt ant No.3: SRI V.NARASTMHA GOUD, SC for HMDAcounser for the Respondent No.6: sRr N.,RAVEEN Counsel for the Respondent No.8: K,MAR, Sc for MuniciparityGp FOR HOMEGp FOR HOME
The Court made the following: OROER
?
l,!ii,]L
THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHERIP
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Writ petition is filed seeking aWrit of Mandamus todeclare the action of the respondentNo. 6 in e n terta in ingapplication/s with regard to grant of building permission filed bythird parties, in spite of the petitioners objections and withoutthere being any approved layout in respect of Survey Nos.1 to 21,and in not furnishing information with regard to the buildingpermissions sanctioned in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.3B-33 guntas in Survey Nos.14 and 15 situated at Salarjung Kancha,Parvathapur Village, Medipally Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District,in spite of the judgment and decree, dated 15.06.2007, passed inO.S.N0.1105 of 2006 by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, RangaReddy District at L,B. Nagar, as illegal and arbitrary.
2, Heard the learned counsel for both sides and [perused ][the]record,
3. In the course of submissions, [it ][is ][brought ][to ][the ][notice ][of]this Court that the [petitioners ][are ][seeking ][relief ][against ][third]parties, who are not made as [party ][respondents ][to ][the ][present]Writ Petition.
4. It is [pertinent ]to [state ][that ][the ][perSo[s; against ][whom ][the]petitioners are seeking relief, are [necessary ][parties ][for ][effective]of the [Writ Petition. ][The ][petitioners ][ought ][to ][have]adjudication made them as [parties ][to this Writ ][Petition and ][sought relief']
(
\
5. [Under ][these ][circumstances' ][the Writ ][Petition ][is ][liable ][to ][be]dismissed [for ][not ][making ][the ][necessary ][parties ][as ][party]respondents [to ][the ][writ ][Petition']
6. Accordingly, [the ][Writ ][Petition ][is ][dismissed' ][However' liberty]is granted t; [the ][petitioners ][to ][file ][a fresh ][Writ ][Petition ][by ][making]the [persons, ][who are ][filing ][applications ][to ][seek ][building ][permission]in respect of [the ][subject property, ][as parties ][to ][the ][Writ ][Petition']
Miscellaneous Petitions, [if ][any, ][pending ][in this Writ ][Petition]shall stand closed. [There shall ][be no ][order ][as ][to ][costs']
SD/-R.KARTHIKEYANASSISTANT [REGISTRAR](t!', ,TRUE [COPY//]
SECTION [OFFICER]
I
to',1. -*o CCs to the GP for Revenue' High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT]-*o CCs to the GP for Revenue' High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT]
2. Two CCs [to ][the ][GP ][for ][Municipal ][Admn ][& ][Urban Dev ][' ][High ][Court ][for ][the ][State]of Telangana [OUTIof Telangana [OUTI
3. Two [CCs ][to ][the GP ][for Home' High ][Court ][for the ][State of ][Telangana ][[OUT]]
4. One CC [to ][SRI ][C'HANUMANTHA RAO' Advocate ][[OPUC]]
5. One [CC ][to ][SRI ][V NARASIMHA GOUD' ][SC ][for HMDA ][IOPUCI]
6. One [CC ][to SRI N.PRAVEEN KUMAR' ][SC ][for Municipality ][[OPUC]]
7. Two C.D. [CoPies.]
8. One SPare [CoPY.]
MRCE
HIGH [COURT]
DATED:30112/2021
ORDERWP.No.36755 [ol ][2021]
DISMISSING [THE WRIT PETITION]WITHOUT [COSTS]
I
irl.; [5 ][lAtt]or.{9'-l:)25 Jrtt [20?2]:I:-)J.-,C