Telangana High Court
CRP/6610/2012 of Mr. Bhagwanda Toshinwal Vs Smt. Shantha Devi Darak on 31 December 2021
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:6 6 10 oF2 120 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 17-1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:6 6 10 oF20 12
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the orderdated 17-1 1-2012 in 1.A.No.2039 of 2O11 in O.S.No.528 o'f [2O1O ]on the [file of ][the]Court of the ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad.
Between:
Mr. Bhagwanda Toshinwal, S/o late Munnalal [Toshinwal, ][aged ]^55. [years,. ][Occ:]BusinesJ, Office at 15-'1-503/D/9, 2nd [floor, Ashok ][Market, ][Old ][Feelkhana,]Hyderabad
...'ET'r.NER/DEFENDANT
AND
Smt. Shantha Devi Darak, [W/o ][Late ][Sri Bhagwandas ][Darak' ][aged 47 ][years, ][Occ:]Housewife Fr/o H.No.14-2-186/2, Sri [colony, ].nr^ '::ile,EEBiuBf,tfiBtt,"r,r, CRPMP. NO: 8803 OF [20'12]
Petition under section 151 CPC [praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated ][in ][the]affidavit filed therewith, the [High Court may ][be ][pleased to stay all ][further ][Proceedings]in respect to the Suit bearing [OS.No.52B ][ol ][2010 ][on the ][file ][of ][ll ][Additional Chief]Judge, City Civil Court [at Hyderabad.]
CRPMP. NO: 3332 OF 2017
Between:
Smt. Shantha Devi [Darak, ][W/o Late Sri Bhagwandas Darak, ][aged.47 ][years, ][Occ:]H o u s ewi re R/o [H. ][N ][o. ][1 ][4 ][- ][2 - ][1 ][86 ][t ][2, ][S ][ri ][C o ][I ][o ][n ]v, [S ][h a ][h. ][I ][n ][a ][va ];ffti J;,'-?$rt ru o e ru rANDMr. Bhagwanda Toshinwal, [S/o late ][Munnalal ][Toshinwal, ][gSed ]^qq [years'. ][Occ:]e;sineJi Office at [15-1-5O3tOl9, ][2nd ][floor, Ashok ][Market, ][Old ][Feelkhana']Hyderabad ...RESpoNDENT/pETtrtoNER
Petition under section [151 ][cPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the circumstances ][stated in ][the]affidavit filed therewith, [the ][High ][court ][may be pleased vacate ][the ][interim order dated]04.01.2013 [passed in ][CRPI\4P ][No.8803/2012 in CRP ][No ][661 ][012012']
Counsel for the [Petitioner: ][SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR]
Counsel forthe [Respondent No'1: ][SRI ][BANKATLAL ][MANDHANI]
The Court made [the ][following: ][ORDER]
CIVIL REVISION [PETITION ][No.661O ][of ][2OL2]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
As per the case status information, [O.S.No.528 ][of ][2010]on the fi1e of II Additional Chief Judge, [City ][Civil ][Court,]Hyderabad itself was disposed of on [5. ][l2 ]'20 [18.]
To,
Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is [dismissed ][as]infructuous. No order as to costs. [Miscellaneous petitions]pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.K.VENKAIAHASSISTANT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY'GSECTION OFFICER
1. The ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court [at ][Hyderabad.]
(with records if any)
2. One CC to Sri Suresh Shiv Sagar, [Advocate ][OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri Bankatlal Mandhani, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies5. One Sparecopyobr"&
HIGH COURT
DATED: 31t1212021
ORDERCRP.No.6610 of 2012
DttsMtsstNc THE cRPAS INFRUCTUOUS
n
.J['tlrE ][$A]YJo17 Fit ?"22,o,-l