Telangana High Court
WP/40679/2014 of M. Jivula Naik, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.40679 of 2014 DATE: 30.12.2014 Between: M.Jivula Naik …Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh and others …Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI V.RAGHUNATH COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS 1 to 4: AGP FOR IRRIGATION AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION No.40679of2014DATE: 30.12.2014Between:M.Jivula Naik…Petitioner andThe State of Andhra Pradesh and others…Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI V.RAGHUNATHCOUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS 1 to 4: AGP FOR IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT(AP)
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.40679of2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed with the grievance that on the onehand, respondents 1 to 4 have not been finalizing the proposalsinitiated vide letter No.DEE/C&B-I/NSRSSP/291, dated 24.10.2014 ofthe Deputy Executive Engineer, C & B Sub division No.I, NSRSSrisailam Project, for allotment of Acs.51.54 cents of land in favour ofSri Brahmaramba Mallikarjuna District Tribal Rural DevelopmentSociety, and on the other hand, the officials have not been preventingrespondent No.5 from proceeding with the illegal construction over apart of the said land.
The petitioner has averred that representation dated 16.12.2014has been submitted to various functionaries including respondent No.3seeking redressal of the grievances and that no action has been takenthereon.
At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader forIrrigation and Command Area Development (Andhra Pradesh) oninstructions, submitted that on coming to know about the alleged illegalconstructions being made by respondent No.5, the IrrigationDepartment is preparing to issue notice to the said respondent and thatit will initiate all required measures to prevent illegal constructions ofrespondent No.5. Inasmuch as the petitioner’s representationsubmitted to respondent No.3 is stated to be pending, the saidrespondent is directed to redress the petitioner’s grievance, do theneedful and communicate his decision to the petitioner expeditiously.
As regards the grievance against respondent No.5, thesubmission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader referred toabove is placed on record and respondent No.3 is directed to initiateappropriate measures for preventing the illegal constructions, if anymade by respondent No.5 after issuing notice to him.
Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.50981 of 2014 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of asinfructuous.
30[th] DECEMBER, 2014.
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
kvni