Telangana High Court
WP/23787/2004 of S. Sampath Reddy, Vs The Commandant, on 29 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 23787 of 2004 Between: S. Sampath Reddy, S/o. S. Rami Reddy, R/o. H.No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No: 23787 of 2004
Between:
S. Sampath Reddy, S/o. S. Rami Reddy,
R/o. H.No. 51-15-11E, Rajeev Nagar, Kurnool.
AND
..... PETITIONER
The Commandant, II Betallion, Andhra Pradesh Special Police (APSP), Kurnool.
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ, order or direction or particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus,declaring the action of the respondent in issuing the impugned memo in Rc.No.12/BWO/2004 dt. 10-12-2004 by asking the petitioner to stop running the Cable TVNetwork system in the respondent campus from 31-12-2004, even though petitioneris permitted to run the cable TV Network system vide letter dt. 04-01-2002 andbasing on the same petitioner spent huge amount by laying the new cable wire etc.,as illegal, arbitrary violative of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of Constitution of Indiaand consequently direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to run the cablenetwork in the respondent campus.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR HOME
The Court at the admission stage made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner challenges the action of the respondent in issuing letter, dated10.12.2004, wherein the petitioner was asked to stop the running of Cable TVNetwork System in the campus of II Battalion, Andhra Pradesh Special Police(APSP), Kurnool, from 31.12.2004. The petitioner states that he has been operatingthe Cable TV Network in the campus since the year 1993 and the respondent hadabruptly terminated the contract without following the due procedure.
The matter was adjourned twice to enable the learned Government Pleader forHome to obtain instructions. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner andlearned Government Pleader for Home and after examination of the matter, thisCourt is of the view that the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent ispurely contractual and civil in nature and if so advised, the petitioner has toapproach the civil Court to work out his remedies.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out hisremedies in a Civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs.
29.12.2004
___________
Jsu
To
1. The Commandant, II Betallion, Andhra Pradesh Special Police(APSP), Kurnool.(APSP), Kurnool.
2. 2 CCs to the G.P. for Home, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT).
3. 2 CD copies.