WA/2350/2005 of M.V.Laxman Rao Vs Eranna on 30 November 2005

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO

and

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY

WRIT APPEAL NO.2350 of 2005

30[th] November 2005

(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated27.09.2005 in W.P.NO.18085 OF 2005 on the file of the High Court.)

Between:

1 M.V.Laxman Rao S/o.Sri Venkat Ratnam, APTRANSCO, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad.

2 AP TRANSCO, Vidyut Soudha, Khairtabad, Hyderabad rep.by its Chairperson & Managing Director.3 The Divisional Engineer, (Elec), EHT & SSAPTransco, Chandrayangutta, Champapet, Hyderabad-500079.

AND

...APPELLANTS

Eranna S/o.Late Sri Sayanna, H.No.8-2-684/96/9, NBT Nagar,Road No.12, Near Kaman, Hyderabad –500034.

...RESPONDENT

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

WRIT APPEAL NO. 2350 OF 2005

JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Prakash Rao)

Heard both the sides.

In this appeal, the respondent herein who is the writ petitioner, seeks to assail theorder dated 27.09.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.23022 of 2005 in W.P.No.18085 of 2005passed by the learned single Judge giving certain directions in regard to payment ofcertain terminal benefits and ordering notice.Though several contentions sought to be urged on behalf of the appellants herein toshow that the impugned action is only submitting the case of the respondent toMedical Board that too, in terms of the earlier orders passed by this Court, we are notgoing into the merits of this case since on the face of it the order appears to be theinterim order only before filing any counter affidavit by the appellants herein. Hence,the appellants herein can as well file counter affidavit for vacating the impugnedorder. We do not find any merits in this appeal and it is not a fit case to go into the Accordingly the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs.

30[th ]November 2005.

Chvn.

__________________B. PRAKASH RAO, J

_____________________

R. SUBHASH REDDY, J