Telangana High Court
WP/21974/2004 of Smt. Lakshminarasamma, Vs The Government of India, on 30 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 21974 of 2004 Between: Smt. Lakshminarasamma,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY
And
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO : 21974 of 2004
Between:
Smt. Lakshminarasamma, W/o. Late Venkatramulu, Sweeper, O/o. the Welfare Administrator, Labour Welfare Organisation, Kalichedu, Nellore District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, Rep by its Director General (Labour Welfare), New Delhi - 11.
2 The Welfare Commissioner, Labour Welfare Organisation, Kendriya Sadan, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. Kendriya Sadan, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorarideclaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the Order No. 2/24/A1/2004, dt.1-07-2004 transferring and posting the petitioner to Beedi Workers Welfare fundDispensary, Mukkudal as confirmed by the Central Administrative Tribunal vide itsorder in O.A.NO. 760/2004, dt. 1-10-2004 as arbitrary, illegal and violative ofprinciples of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and direct therespondents to transfer and post the petitioner to a nearest place preferably atSiddipet, Medak District where there is a post of Sweeper existing and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SHARAT KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (SC FOR CG)
The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER: (per GB.J.)
The Writ Petition is filed assailing the order passed by the CentralAdministrative Tribunal (for short Tribunal) in O.A.No.760 of 2004, dated1.10.2004.
2. The petitioner, who was appointed on compassionate appointment scheme,has now been transferred to Beedi Workers Welfare Fund Dispensary,Mukkudal, Tamil Nadu State. The Tribunal, while refusing to interfere with theorders of transfer, disposed of the above OA with the following directions:
“In view of the above facts and circumstances, we do not find anyinfirmity in the action taken on the part of the respondents or thereis any violation of any statutory rule and in view of the fact that therespondents have stated in their counter reply that as and whenvacancy arises the applicant could be considered for her transfer,we do not find any reason to interfere with the transfer order.However, we find that the applicant deserves sympatheticconsideration. The respondents shall consider the case of theapplicant sympathetically as and when vacancies are available atSiddipet or anywhere in A.P.”
Against the said order, the present Writ Petition has been filed.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a widowand it will be very difficult for her to work at Tamil Nadu. It is further submittedthat there is a vacancy at Siddipet, Medak District and also at Hyderabad,where she could be accommodated.
4. We have also heard Mr.A.Rajasekhar Reddy, learned Standing Counselappearing for respondents.
5. The Tribunal has directed the respondents to consider the matter onsympathetical lines. We also find that the petitioner being a widow, she has tobe accommodated in the nearest place possible. Even though the Rules permittransfer, yet it cannot be said that she should be transferred from AndhraPradesh to Tamil Nadu State. Considering the facts though we are not inclined to interfere with the order of the Tribunal, we direct the authorities to considerthe case of the petitioner by posting her anywhere in Andhra Pradesh includingHyderabad or Siddipet, Medak District, as stated by the learned counsel for thepetitioner.
6. With the direction indicated above, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
-------------------------------
(G.BIKSHAPATHY, J.)
30[th] December, 2004.
-------------------------------
(P.S.NARAYANA, J.)
SSR
1 The Director General, (Labour Welfare), Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi - 11.Labour, New Delhi - 11.
2 The Welfare Commissioner, Labour Welfare Organisation, Kendriya Sadan, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. Kendriya Sadan, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad.
3 The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad.
4 2 CD copies.