Telangana High Court

WP/29228/2009 of Burra Soundrya Vs District Panchayat Officer, on 31 December 2009

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.29228 of 2009 Between: Burra Soundarya ..... PETITIONER AND District Panchayat

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE

PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA

WRIT PETITION No.29228 of 2009

Between:

Burra Soundarya

AND

..... PETITIONER

District Panchayat Officer, Warangal, Warangal district and twoothers

..... RESPONDENTS

ORDER:

The matter is coming up for admission.

2. Heard Sri P. Prabhakar Reddy, the learned counselrepresenting the writ petitioner and the learned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Panchayat Raj representing therespondents 1 to 3.

3. The Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of Certioraricalling for the records relating to order No.1772/A2/2009 dated 03-07-209 passed by the District Panchayat Officer, Warangal – thefirst respondent herein withdrawing the cheque power of thepetitioner and the memo No.15865/PTS.II/A1/2009-4 dated 25-11-2009 passed by the third respondent and quash the same holdingthem as highly arbitrary, bad and illegal and pass such other suitable orders.

4. It is stated that the petitioner was elected as Sarpanch ofGram Panchayat in the year 2006. It is also stated that on 31-03-2009 as per the enquiry report of the second respondent the GramPanchayat collected amounts of Rs.4,60,374/- and the saidamount is in the hands of Gram Panchayat. Further it is stated thatthe first respondent passed orders on 03-07-2009 directing theSarpanch and the Panchayat Secretary not to draw the SFC, PFCand B.R.G.F. funds. It is further stated that on 25-11-2009 the staygranted in the revision petition was vacated without notice to thepetitioner and without hearing the petitioner.

5. It is needless to say that the third respondent granted stay infavour of the petitioner. Pending revision petition, without affordingan opportunity to her, vacating the stay may not be just andproper. In the light of the same, let the stay granted in favour ofthe petitioner be continued till disposal of the revision petition andlet the third respondent dispose of the revision petition itself withina period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder.

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall beno order as to costs.

December 31, 2009.Note: Operative portionby wire. B/o.PN

___________________

P.S. NARAYANA, J

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA

WRIT PETITION No.29228 of 2009

December 31, 2009

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead