WP/26892/1995 of K.ADINARAYANA Vs SECY.APSEB.HYD on 29 November 1995

Conclusion

ORDER:

This writ petition has been filed for a writ of Mandamus to declarethe action of the respondents in not protecting the petitioner’s life andproperty situated at Survey No.282/1 Isnapur Village, Sanga ReddyTaluk, Medak District along with plant and machinery from theerstwhile workers of M/s. Hyderabad Lamps Limited, as illegal andarbitrary.

On 24.8.2007 there was no representation for the petitioner.Even today there is no representation for the writ petitioner. It is,therefore, reasonable to presume that the writ petitioner is notinterested in pursuing the writ petition. Even otherwise, the writpetition is liable to be dismissed in view of the statement of the learnedAssistant Government Pleader for Home that on the complaint givenby the contractor employed by the petitioner for carrying out the repairing works of the factory premises, Crime No.59 of 2006 wasregistered and later on, the accused was acquitted by the competentCriminal Court.

In view of the above, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed,and accordingly, the writ petition is ordered.

Date: 03.09.2007

_____________________________

C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J

Ksn