Telangana High Court
WP/24593/2004 of Mir Ahmed Ali Khna Vs The Collector record survey settlements Ranga Reddy on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24593 of 2004 Between: Mir Ahmed Ali Khan, S/o Mohammed Ali Khan, Chandrayanagutta,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
WRIT PETITION NO : 24593 of 2004
Between:
Mir Ahmed Ali Khan, S/o Mohammed Ali Khan,Chandrayanagutta, Narquipool Bagh, Hyderabad.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Collector record survey settlements, Ranga Reddy District Lakadikapool, Hyderabad.
2 The Assistant Director, Survery Settlements, R.R.district at Lakadikapool, Hyderabad 3 The Mandal Surveyor, Saroornagar Mandal, at M.R.O. Office, Saroornagar, R.R.District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ of Mandamus while declaring inaction of respondents not completing thedemarcation of boundaries survey in the land admeasuring 0-33 gts in Sy.no.132/2Gaddi Annaram V of Sarrornagar Mandal, R.R,.District pursuant to intimation noticesdt. 01-10-2004 as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory besides violative offundamental rights and principles of natural justice, direct the respondents tocontinue/complete the demarcation of survey by installing the stones on boundariesin the light of survey of second respondent dt.30-10-2001.
For the Petitioner: MR. M. PRAVEEN KUMAR, Advocate.
For the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court at the stage of admission made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader forRevenue and with their consent the writ petition itself is disposed of at the stage ofadmission.
The petitioner states that in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 18-09-2001, made in W.P. No.19325 of 2001 filed by him, the second respondentconducted survey demarcation of boundaries in respect of his land admeasuringAc.0-33 guntas situated in Survey No.132/2 of Gaddi Annaram V, SaroornagarMandal of R.R. District, on 30-10-2001, without fixing the boundary stones. Hisgrievance is that though he made applications twice with requisite fee to the MandalRevenue Officer, Saroornagar Mandal for fixation of boundary stones in his land bythe third respondent-Mandal Surveyor, as per the survey demarcation conducted bythe second respondent, the survey stones have not been fixed up so far. Hence, thewrit petition.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate todirect the respondents to complete the work relating to fixation of survey stones inthe land as prayed for by the petitioner, expeditiously, if not already done.
With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission.No costs.
______________
N.V. RAMANA, J
Svv
To
1 The Collector record survey settlements, Ranga Reddy District Lakadikapool, Hyderabad.Lakadikapool, Hyderabad.
2 The Assistant Director, Survery Settlements, R.R.district at Lakadikapool, Hyderabad Lakadikapool, Hyderabad 3 The Mandal Surveyor, Saroornagar Mandal, at M.R.O. Office, Saroornagar, R.R.District.Office, Saroornagar, R.R.District.
4 Two CCs. to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad (OUT).Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad (OUT).
5 Two CD copies.