Telangana High Court
WP/28251/2009 of M/. Savera Bar AND Restaurant Vs The Commissioner of Police, on 29 December 2009
SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA Writ Petition No.28251 OF 2009 ORDER: 1 This Court, while disposing of Writ Petition No.23413 of 2009 filed by the petitioner directed the respondent authorities to consider the representation if any given by the petitioner or otherwise directed the
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADAWrit Petition No.28251 OF 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1 This Court, while disposing of Writ Petition No.23413 of 2009 filedby the petitioner directed the respondent authorities to consider therepresentation if any given by the petitioner or otherwise directed thepetitioner to give a fresh representation within a period of two weeks fromthe date of the order and the respondent authorities were further directedto consider the said representation and pass necessary orders. According to the petitioner he gave a representation to the respondentauthorities on 31.10.2009 and hence he did not give a furtherrepresentation, but, however, as the said representation dated31.10.2009 has not been considered and no orders have been passed. Hence he approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition statingthat the authorities proceeded on the assumption that the petitioner hasnot given any representation pursuant to the orders passed by this Courtin the said Writ Petition.
2Heard both sides.
3Writ Petition No.23413 of 2009 was disposed of with a direction tothe respondents to consider the representation if already given by thepetitioner or otherwise the petitioner was directed to give a representationafresh within a period of two weeks from the date of the order if notalready given. When once it is the contention of the learned counsel forthe petitioner that a representation dated 31.10.2009 has already beengiven by the petitioner, question of giving a fresh representation does notarise and the order stating that the petitioner has not given anyrepresentation within a period of two weeks pursuant to the directiongiven in the earlier writ petition does not arise.
4Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to therespondent authorities to consider the said representation dated 31.10.2009 given by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereonwithin a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.
kvsn
---------------
29-12-2009