Telangana High Court

WP/27370/2007 of A.Lakshmi Prabhavathi, Vs The Joint Collector, on 24 December 2007

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTYFOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN P R E S E N T THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA * * * WRIT PETITION No.27370 of 2007 Between: Smt. Lakshmi Prabhavathi … Petitioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTYFOURTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN

P R E S E N TTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA* * *

WRIT PETITION No.27370 of 2007

Between:Smt. Lakshmi Prabhavathi … Petitioner VersusThe Joint Collector,Kurnool,Kurnool district & Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri JUMV. PRASAD (5728)

Counsel for the Respondents: GOVT.PLEADER FOR CIVILSUPPLIES

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA

* * *

WRIT PETITION No.27370 of 2007

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R :

The matter is coming up ‘for admission’.

2. Heard both the counsel.

3. The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus, declaring theimpugned order of suspension in Proceedings RC.(A) No.1844/07,dated 10-10-2007 issued by the second respondent suspending theauthorization of the petitioner’s Fair Price Shop No.9 at Gadivemulavillage and Mandal, Kurnool district, as illegal, arbitrary andunconstitutional and consequently to set aside the same and tocontinue the petitioner as Fair Price Shop Dealer of Shop No.9,Gadivemula village and Mandal, Kurnool district in the interest ofjustice and to pass such other suitable orders as this Court maydeems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

4. It is stated that an appeal had been preferred to the JointCollector, Kurnool, and the said appeal is pending disposal.

5. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in supportof the writ petition.of the writ petition.

6. This Court is not inclined to express any opinion relating to themerits and demerits of the matter. Since, it is stated that the appeal ismerits and demerits of the matter. Since, it is stated that the appeal is said to be pending on the file of the first respondent. Let the firstrespondent dispose of the appeal and pass appropriate orders onmerits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks, fromthe date of receipt of a copy of this order and till then statusquoobtaining as on today to be maintained.

7. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. No costs.

JUSTICE P . S .NARAYANA .

24/12/2007.

NB:

1) Furnish CC of the Order today itself.B/o. ISLB/o. ISL

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead