Telangana High Court
WA/789/2016 of T NARENDER Vs PRL.SECRETARY (GAD) AND ANOTHERS on 29 December 2023
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT WRIT APPEAL NO: 789 OF 2016 Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dt. 22-07-2016 passed in Wp.No.1276112016 on the file of the
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILIANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT APPEAL NO: 789 OF 2016
Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dt.22-07-2016 passed in Wp.No.1276112016 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
T Narender, S/o Jemla, aged 29 years, Rl/o Khima Naik Thanda, H/o Dampur,Loddiguda Village, Tiryani Mandal, Adilabad ,,",r,",. ...o"".LLANr/pETt.oNER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, General Administration(SC-A) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.2. The District Collector,, Adilabad District at Adilabad.
"RESPoND€Nrs/REsPoNDENrs
t.A. No: 1 oF 2016(WAMP. No: 1924 oF zolill Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe respondents to forthwith provide suitable employment to the petitioner oncompassionate basis without reference to Clause 4 of G.O.Ms.No. 504 dated11.8.2008 issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the writ appeal.Counsel for the Appellant: SRI T. SUJAN KUMAR
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Counsel for Respondent No. 2: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BL]D ISRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
AND
THE HON'BLE SIII JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAOWRIT APPEAL No.789 of 20 6
p.r t no^ btc sn rusnce Abhtl@d Ku,iar shouittl JUDGMENTi karneci counsel for the appellant has ir-rformed theCotrrt that the rvrit appeal has become infructuous
2. [n vie:w of the same, Writ Appeal is clisrnisscd asinlrlrctuous. Tht re shall be no order as to L-osLs.
3. As a se<1uel, miscellaneous applications [pe ]nding, ifany, shall stand <:losed.
SD/.I. NAGALAKSHMIDEPUW \JGISTRAR)iSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,'1. One CC to Sri T Sujan Kumar Advocate [OPUC]2. fwo CCs to GP For General Administration, High Court for the State ofTelangana. [OUT]3. Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]4. Two CD CopiesMBCGJPsNd I
r
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2911212023
1HE SI4()R/t$({\\,O 2 FEB 2tr11 Eif\\er{+t:.; o[*]{-.:-.IUDGMENT
WA.No.'789 of 2016
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL ASINFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS