Telangana High Court
CRP/594/2016 of S MUNDADA, HYDERABAD Vs SHRAVAN BADRUKA, HYDERABAD AND ANR on 31 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIR rwo rH o ;i']I S Ti J D#YE fff fSfi E M B E R PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA Petition under Section 22 0f Buirding (Lease, Rent Eviction) contror Act 1960,aggrieved bythe Orderdated.26-10-2015 passed in RA No.17.t of
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABADAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE THIRD#YE rwo rH o ;i']I S Ti J fff fSfi E M B E R
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
crv LREVIstoN PETITION NO:5940F2016
Petition under Section 22 0f Buirding (Lease, Rent Eviction) contror Act 1960,aggrieved bythe Orderdated.26-10-2015 passed in RA No.17.t of 2o140n the fiteof the Additional chief Judge, city Small causes court at Hyderabad preferredagainst order dt: 2gro3r14 in R.c.No. 'r83 of 2010 on the fire of the court of the rAdditional Rent Controller at Hyderabad.
Between:
S l\,4undada, S/o Kanayanlal I\,4undada Occ: Business R/o Begum Bazar, Hyderabad
...REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
AND
1. Shravan Badruka, S/o Mukundlal Badruka Occ: Business
2. Shyam Badruka, S/o lr4ukundlal Badruka Occ: Business IBoth Residents of H.No. 8-2-686/9/9 & 10, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT
CRPMP. NO: 746 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the order passed in RA NO.171 of 2O14 dated:26.10.2015 passed by theHon'ble Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad pendingdisposal of the Revision Petition .
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl. DAMODAR MUNDRA
Counsel for the Respondents :SRl. R A ACHUTHANAND
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLE [DR. ][JUSTICE CHILLAKUR ][SUMALATHA]CIVILREvISIONON[NO.59][40F][ 2016]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned [counsel ][for the ][petitioner submits ][that ][the ][matter]
hasbeensettledbetweenthepartiesand,therefore,theCivilRevision Petition [may ][be ][dismissed']
the [said ][submission' the Civil ][Revision ][Petition ][is]Recording dismissed [as ][infructuous.]
There shall be [no ][order ][as ][to costs' ][Miscellaneous]. T.l-l.19*9 [1r ][i-nlvr::.*9 ][i:e ][:!:r ][t ][:-l ][e'li ][*:'1i ][*e ][d]S
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMIASSISTANT [REGISTRAR]
//TRUE [COPY//]
SECTION [OFFICER]
To.Court at 1. The Additional [chref ][Judge' ][gitv ]?I"l]-g::les i rn" [1 ][Additionat ][Rent ][Controller at ][HyderaDao ].3. one [cc to ][sRl. ][onrvrdoni{rt'ruNDRA'-Advocate [oPUC]];. il; cc [io ][snr. ][n n ][ncHuiHnNAND' ][Advocate ][[oPUCj]1. The Additional [chref ][Judge' ][gitv ]?I"l]-g::les i rn" [1 ][Additionat ][Rent ][Controller at ][HyderaDao ].3. one [cc to ][sRl. ][onrvrdoni{rt'ruNDRA'-Advocate [oPUC]];. il; cc [io ][snr. ][n n ][ncHuiHnNAND' ][Advocate ][[oPUCj]
Court at [Hvderabad]
5. Two [CD CoPies]6. One [SPare ][CoPY]
CDLTR
HIGH [COURT]
DATED:31 [11212021]
ORDERCRP.No.594 of [2016]
DISMISSING THE C.R.PAS INFRUCTUOUS.
t-(rl4ol
E [STAru:]1[t{]-)rloo02 [ttB ][?n2?])Fljt:<;:t T{