Telangana High Court
CC/1292/2004 of GADIRAJU NARENDRA KUMAR Vs C. Mallikharjuna Rao, on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE : B. PRAKASH RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO. 1292 OF 2004 (Contempt Case U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent No.1for willfully and
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
: PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE : B. PRAKASH RAOCONTEMPT CASE NO. 1292 OF 2004
(Contempt Case U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish therespondent No.1for willfully and deliberately disobeying the order of thisHon’ble Court in W.P.M.P.No. 5554 of 2004 in W.P.No. 4231 of 2004 dt. 9-3-2004.)
Between:Gadiraju Narendra Kumar
..Petitioner.
AND1. C. Mallikharjuna Rao S/o. Venkateswarlu, General Manager, D.C.C.B. Ltd., Eluru, West Godavari District.2. The Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar of Co-op. of A.P.,Hyderabad.
(R-2 is not necessary party)
..Respondents.
The Contempt Case coming on for hearing upon perusing the Caseand affidavit filed herein and order of High Court dt. 6-10-2004 & 24-11-2004and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. Thirumala Rani,Advocate for the Petitioner, the Court made the followingORDER:
Having heard the learned counsel on either side and especiallyhaving regard to the fact that R2 is no way concerned with theimplementation of the orders, the order dt. 24.11.2004 is recalled.
It is submitted by the respondent that the orders passed by thisCourt have to be extended under communication to the petitioner.
In view of the same, post after 2 weeks.
DEPUTYREGISTRAR // True Copy//
SECTION OFFICER
To1.C. Mallikharjuna Rao S/o. Venkateswarlu, General Manager, D.C.C.B. Ltd., Eluru, West Godavari District.
2.The Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar of Co-op. of A.P.,Hyderabad. (Addressees 1 & 2 by RPAD)
3.One spare copy.
TKK
HIGH COURT
BPR.J
DATE: 9-12-2004.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
C.C. No. 1292 OF 2004
DIRECTION
TKK
Date of drafting: 10-12-2004.
BPR.J
HIGH COURT
DATE: 9-12-2004.
Note :- Post after 2 weeks.
ORDER
C.C. No. 1292 OF 2004