Telangana High Court
CRLP/3032/2008 of THANNEERU ANIL RAO, Vs CHANNAMANENI KARUNAKAR RAO,AND ANOTHER, on 29 December 2023
couRlfff$DrlFfBrsE oF TELANGANA FRTDAYIlEHf; uExlIX$J!.Rll'' of flr*'i'J*'* THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E'V' VENUGOPAL MINAL TI PRESENT P N N 320 00 c Between: 6^^ ^.^. Business' R/o 6-g-169, Ramnagar' Thanneeru Anil Rao' S/b Anian Rao' Occ: Busines Karimnagar Distnct ...Petitioner AND 3iltsil
oF [TELANGANA]
rN [rHE ][HrGH ][couRlfff$DrlFfBrsE ]
FRTDAYIlEHf; uExlIX$J!.Rll''of [flr*'i'J*'*]
PRESENT
THE [HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ][E'V' VENUGOPAL]
32000cMIN[AL]PTIN[N]
Between:
Business' [R/o 6-g-169, Ramnagar']6^^ ^.^. [[Rao' ][Occ: ]][[Occ: ]][[Busines]]
6^^ ^.^. Thanneeru [Anil ][Rao' ][S/b Anian ][[Rao' ][Occ: ]][[Occ: ]][[Busines]]Karimnagar [Distnct ]
...Petitioner
ANDS/o Kishan [Rao' Occ: Business' R/o ][H ][No']S/o Kishan [Rao' Occ: Business' R/o ][H ][No']1., [Sreenagar ][ColonY'], [Sreenagar ][ColonY']3iltsil ?.,?li, [SlYiSli-:fli]rep. [by ][its Public Prosecutor' ][High Court ][of]rep. [by ][its Public Prosecutor' ][High Court ][of]2.The State [of Andhra ][Pradesh"]A.P., at [HYderabao']A.P., at [HYderabao']
...ResPondent
Petition [under ][Section ][482 ][of ][Cr'P'C ][praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances]stated [in ][the ][Memorandum ][of ][Grounds ][of ][Criminal Petition' ][the ][fligh ]""'lt-l*be [pleased ][to ][quash the order ][dt' ][19-02-2008 passed in ][Crl'R'P'No ][7 ][of 2007 ][on]the file [of ][the ][I ][Additional Sessions Judge' Karimnagar']
This Petition [coming ][on ][for ][hearing, upon ][perusing ][the ][Memorandum ][of]Grounds [of ][Criminal Petition ][and ][upon ][hearing ][the ][alguments ][of]Sri C. SHARAN [REDDY, Advocate ][for ][the ][Petitioner ][and of ][Sri' ][VIZARATH ALI']Assistant Public [Prosecutor ][on ][behalf ][of ][the ][Respondent ][No'2 and ][for ][the]Respondent [No.1 ][None ][Appeared either in person ][or by ][Advocate']
The Court made the [following: ][ORDER]
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINALPETITIONNo.3O32 of2oo8
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal petition is filed under Secti on 4g2
Cr.P.C. seekjng to quash the order in Crt.R.p.No.7 of 2OOZ,dated 19.02.200g passed by the I Additional Sessionsdated 19.02.200g passed by the I Additional SessionsJudge at Karimnagar (for short .the appelate Court)2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent2. The brief facts of the case are that respondentNo.7 /de facto complainant and the petitioner/accused arewell known to each other since a long time. Basing on thesaid acquaintarce, the petitioner approached respondentNo. l, requested him to lend a sum of Rs. 1,5O,OOO/_ tomeet his necessities. Respondent No.1 lend Rs.75,OOO/_on 20.O8.2OO[ ald the remaining Rs.75,OOO/- onmeet his necessities. Respondent No.1 lend Rs.75,OOO/_on 20.O8.2OO[ ald the remaining Rs.75,OOO/- on19.10.2006 and the petitioner executed a pronote forRs.1,5O,OOO/- promising to repay the same with agreedrate of interest. In spite of several demands, the petitionerissued a cheque bearing No.1497415, dated 3o.11.2oo2 [of]towards [legallY][ enforceabl]ean amount [of ][Rs'1,50,000/-]\\rate of interest. In spite of several demands, the petitionerissued a cheque bearing No.1497415, dated 3o.11.2oo2 [of]towards [legallY][ enforceabl]ean amount [of ][Rs'1,50,000/-]\\
debt and request to [present ][the ][same ][in ][the last ][week of]
March, 2003. Respondent No.1 [presented ][the ][said ][cheque]on 26.03.2003 and the same [has ][been ][returned ][unpaid ][on]05.04.2003 with ar endorsement ['insufficient ][funds'.]Respondent No.1 issued a legal [notice ][on ][19.04.2003 ][for]demanding the amount and [inspite ][of receipt of ][the ][same,]the petitioner did not [pay ][the ][amount. ][Hence ][respondent]No.1 frled a complaint [before ][the ][Special ][Judicial]Magistrate of First Class, Excise [at ][Karimnagar, arrd ][the]said complaint was numbered [as ][C.C.No.561 ][of ][2003 ][for]the offence punishable [under ][Section ][138 of ][the ][Negotiable]Instruments Act.
3. In support of its [case, ][the ][prosecution ][examined]PW. 1 and got marked [Exs.P1 ][to ][P10.]
4. After closure of the [prosecution ][evidence, ][the ][accused]was examined U/s.313 Cr.P.C. [wherein ][he ][denied ][the]incriminating evidence spoken by PW.l [against ][hirn ][and]denied the same and [pleaded ]not [guilty.]
5. After appreciating the oral and documentary evidenceand facts before it, the learned Magistrate found theaccused guilty for the offence punishable under Section138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and convicted thepetitioner under Section 255(2) Cr.P.C and sentenced tosuffer simple imprisonment for a period of one year and topay a hne of Rs.S,OOO/- in default of payment of fine tosuffer simple imprisonment of three months. Aggrieved bythe said order, the petitioner/ accused preferredCrl.R.P.No.7 of 2OO7 before the appellate Court, theappellate Court upon examining the material facts arld thejudgment passed by the trial Court has dismissed theCriminal Revision Petition confirming the Judgment passedby the trial Court in C.C.No.561 of 2003. Challenging thesame, the present criminal petition is Iiled
6. There are of both the Courtsconcurrent hndings below with regard to guilty of the petitioner/accused andthe learned counsel for the petitioner/ accused did notplace anlthing before this Court, which would discredit the evidence. Hence, this Court does not lind any reason tointerfere with the well reasoned Judgments/orders passedby both the Courts below. Therefore, the present crirninalpetition is liable to be dismissed.
7 . Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed.Pending miscellaneous applications, if arty, shallstald closed /ffRUE COPY//
SD/.A.V.S. [P]ASSISTANT [REGIS]
SECTION [OFFICER]
To.1. The I Additional [Sessions Judge' Karimnagar.]2. Two CCs [to ][Public ][pr"i""riii ][frign ][Co'ir.t ][for ][the ][State ][of ][Telangana ][at]Hvderabad [OUT]1. The I Additional [Sessions Judge' Karimnagar.]2. Two CCs [to ][Public ][pr"i""riii ][frign ][Co'ir.t ][for ][the ][State ][of ][Telangana ][at]Hvderabad [OUT]3. li# #to [bri ][cl snnnnx ][REDDY' Advocate ][[oPUC]]
4. Two [CD ][CoPies]PSRMY \qr
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
i(.J11oLi [itB 'ij'i]ORDER[- :1 ][',..',]I,]CRLP.No.3032 of [2008]
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DIMISSED.
tc'6q