Telangana High Court
WP/25393/2006 of Y.Pitchaiah Vs The APSRTC, rep. by its Regional Manager, on 27 December 2006
SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 25393 of 2006 Dated: 27.12.2006 Between: Y. Pitchaiah, S/o Gopaiah, aged about 54 years, R/o Polenigudem village, Bethavulu post, Silkuru Mandal, Nalgonda District. .... PETITIONER AND The A.P.S.R.T.C., rep. by its Regional Manager, Nalgonda Region,
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
Writ Petition No. 25393 of 2006
Dated: 27.12.2006
Between:
Y. Pitchaiah, S/o Gopaiah, aged about 54 years, R/o Polenigudemvillage, Bethavulu post, Silkuru Mandal, Nalgonda District.
AND
.... PETITIONER
The A.P.S.R.T.C., rep. by its Regional Manager, Nalgonda Region,Nalgonda District and another.
.....RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAWrit Petition No. 25393 of 2006
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedStanding Counsel for the respondents-APSRTC.
The petitioner is working as Conductor in the respondents-APSRTC. His main grievance is that when the respondents-Corporation has not fixed his pay by adding yearly increments aftercompletion of various punishments imposed, he made a representationdated 07.08.2003 requesting the respondents-Corporation to fix his payby adding yearly increments from the year 2000. But, no action hasbeen taken by the respondents-Corporation so far. Hence, he filed thepresent writ petition.
Since the representation of the petitioner dated 07.08.2003,seeking fixation of his pay by adding yearly increments, is said to bepending consideration before the respondents-Corporation, instead ofkeeping the writ petition pending, I deem it appropriate to dispose of thesame with the following direction:
The respondents-Corporation is directed to consider therepresentation of the petitioner, dated 07.08.2003, and pass appropriateorders thereon in accordance with law.
Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
___________________
N.V. RAMANA, J.
Date: 27.12.2006NSR/ISL