Telangana High Court
WP/24440/2004 of D.Bhanu Prakash, Vs The Addl.Agent to the Govt., East Godavari Dist. at on 28 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.24440 of 2004 Between: D. Bhanu Prakash, S/o late Kalyana Rao, Resident of Nellipudi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAWRIT PETITION NO.24440 of 2004
Between:
D. Bhanu Prakash, S/o late Kalyana Rao,
Resident of Nellipudi (V), Gangavaram (M), E.G. District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1. The Addl. Agent to the Govt., East Godavari District at Rampachodavaram.
2. The Special Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District.
3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Gangavaram (M), E.G. District.
....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writof Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in evicting thepetitioner from the land to an extent of Ac.1.40 cents in Survey No.18 of Nellipudivillage, Gangavaram Mandal, E.G. District in pursuance of the order inL.T.R.P.No.99/04 passed by the 2[nd] respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unjust andconsequently direct the respondents not to evict the petitioner from the above landpending disposal of the appeal preferred before the 1[st] respondent.Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VENKATESH
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that he filed an appeal beforethe 1[st] respondent on 08.12.2004 against the order of the 2[nd] respondent inL.T.R.P.No.99 of 2004, dated 29.09.2004, but the 1[st] respondent neither consideredthe same nor passed any orders so far and hence aggrieved by the inaction of therespondents, the present writ petition has been filed.
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleaderfor Revenue.
Without expressing anything on merits of the matter, the 1[st] respondent is directed toconsider the appeal filed by the petitioner on 08.12.2004 and shall dispose of thesame in accordance with law expeditiously, if not already disposed of. Till such timestatus quo existing as on today shall be maintained.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
________________
(N.V. RAMANA, J)
// TRUE COPY //
To1. The Addl. Agent to the Govt., East Godavari District atRampachodavaram.
.... REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
2. The Special Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District.
3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Gangavaram (M), E.G. District.
4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of AP, Hyderabad (OUT)
5. Two CD copies.