Telangana High Court
CRLP/10933/2009 of Mirza Ghulam Ali Abbas Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.10933 OF 2009 Between: Mirza Ghulam Ali Abbas, S/o. Mirza Gulam Ali Akbar ..... Petitioner – Accused AND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.10933 OF 2009
Between:
Mirza Ghulam Ali Abbas, S/o. Mirza Gulam Ali Akbar
..... Petitioner – Accused
AND
The State of A.P.,through Abids Police Station,Hyderabad, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad .....Respondent HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.10933 OF 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner Mirza Ghulam Ali Abbas, accused, seeking to quash theorder dated 26-08-2009 in Criminal M.P. No.3175 of 2009 in C.C.No.756 of 2009 passed by the learned II Additional Chief MetropolitanMagistrate, Hyderabad, and consequently return item Nos.1 to 6, of theschedule of property of the impugned petition, to the petitioner forinterim custody.
2. Heard.
3. The offence alleged against the petition is under Section 292 IPC.
4. In view of the nature of offence, which is very serious one, i.e. providing access to obscene pictures to teenage boys and girls thattoo making arrangements to sit them in pairs in closed cabins, it is not at all a fit case for releasing the property seized in connectionwith the crime pending trial. Hence, I see no ground to entertain thispetition.
5. Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed at theadmission stage itself.
__________________
P. SWAROOP REDDY, J
December 29, 2009.PV