Telangana High Court
WP/26125/2008 of G.B. Shyam Rao Vs Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation on 30 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 26125 of 2008 Between: G.B. Shyam Rao S/o. Sri Balak Das R/o. H.No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADAWRIT PETITION NO : 26125 of 2008
Between:
G.B. Shyam Rao S/o. Sri Balak Das
R/o. H.No. 2-2-1107/79, Tilak Nagar,
Hyderabad - 500 044.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Rep. by its Commissioner & Special Officer Tank Bund, Secunderabad.
2 The Assistant City Planner Circle III, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Abids, Hyderabad - 500 001.
3 Mr. Rajeshwar S/o. Late Sri Danaiah
R/o. H.No. 2-2-1107/51, Tilak Nagar,
Hyderabad - 500 044.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the natureof a writ of mandamus declaring that the inaction on the part of the 1st and2nd respondents in failing to act upon the representation dated 06-11-2008 and failing to prevent the 3rd respondent from proceeding withconstruction over the public road (G.V.M. Road) leading from NewNallakunta to Tilak Nagar as illegal and arbitrary and consequently directthe 2nd respondent to demolish and remove the unauthorizedconstruction made by the 3rd respondent in violation of the municipal bye-laws and over the public road and prevent the 3rd respondent frommaking any constructions over the public road and grant such other reliefor reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interests ofjustice and in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.M.MOHIUDDIN
Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SCFOR MCH 1,2,4&6
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Sri G.M. Mohiuddin, learned counsel appearing for the petitionerfiled a letter-dated 23.12.2008 before the Registry, seeking permission ofthis Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Thereshall be no order as to costs.
_______________________________
GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J
Dt. 30.12.2008KA
To
// TRUE COPY //
..... REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
1 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Rep. by itsCommissioner & Special Officer Tank Bund, Secunderabad.
2 The Assistant City Planner Circle III, Greater Hyderabad MunicipalCorporation Abids, Hyderabad - 500 001.
3. 2CD copies