Telangana High Court
WP/24080/2004 of S.Laxmana Murthy Vs The Vice-ChairmanANDManagine Director on 30 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 24080 of 2004 Between: S.Laxmana Murthy S/o.Pilla Loka Chary, Assistant Hydrogeolgist,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 24080 of 2004
Between:
S.Laxmana Murthy S/o.Pilla Loka Chary, Assistant Hydrogeolgist, Office of the Executive Engineer, A.P.State Irrigation Development Corporation Ltd., Khammam Dist.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Vice-Chairman & Managing Director A.P. State Irrigation Development Corp Ltd., Mytri Vanam, 1st Floor, HUDA Commercial Complex, Ammerpet, Hyderabad -38.
2 The Board of Director rep by its Chairman, A.P. State Irrigation Development Corp Ltd., Mytri Vanam,1st Floor, HUDA Commercial Complex, Ammerpet, Hyderabad -38.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a writ or order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaringthe action of the respondent No.2 in not disposing the appeal dt 30-12-1996 againstthe orders of the respondent No.1 passed in his proceedingsNo.IDC/MD/ADM/S.11/E47/10/84/7758 dt 5/6-12-1996 awarding punishment of with-holding of two increments with cumulativeeffect as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution ofIndia besides being violative of natural justice; while issuing a consequential direction to the respondents to treat the period from 3-6-1995 to 5-7-1996 as dutywith all attendant and consequential benefits in the interest of justice and pass suchother order or orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.GOVARDHANACHARY
Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.TADDI NAGESWARA RAO
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed against the action of the second respondent in notdisposing the appeal dated 30.12.1996 against the order passed by the firstrespondent awarding punishment of withholding of two increments withcumulative effect.
It is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for both the parties that theappeal is still pending with the second respondent-Board. Therefore, withoutgoing into the merits of the writ petition, a direction can be given to the secondrespondent-Board to dispose of the appeal in the next Board meeting.
With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
_____________
K.C. BHANU,J
Date: 30-12-2004
klp
To
1 The Vice-Chairman & Managing Director A.P. State Irrigation Development Corp Ltd., Mytri Vanam, 1st Floor, HUDA Commercial Complex, Ammerpet, Hyderabad -38. Hyderabad -38.
2 The Board of Director rep by its Chairman, A.P. State Irrigation Development Corp Ltd., Mytri Vanam,1st Floor, HUDA Commercial Complex, Ammerpet, Hyderabad -38. Hyderabad -38.
3. 2CD copies