Telangana High Court

WP/36876/2024 of V. Pramotish Chandra Reddy Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITI ON NO: 36876 oF 2024 [ 31681 about 73 Dwaraka ...PETITIONER Between: AND 1 V. Pramotish Chandra

[ [31681]

HIGH COURT [FOR ][THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE [THIRTY FIRST ][DAY ][OF ][DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENTY ][FOUR]

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE ][K.LAKSHMAN]

WRIT PETITI[ON NO: 36876][ oF ][2024]

Between:V. Pramotish Chandra [Reddy, ][S/o' ][V' ][Ramch-andra.-feddy'.Ag.e1J]"J;.'d;;." hesidency, Acchaiah [ntio. ][-covt ][Nagar, Nallakunta, Hyderabao'][e-riftovee, ][pUo ][1'8-725t8t1 ][and ][Bt2']

about 73[[Bt2']]Dwaraka ...PETITIONER

AND

1The State of [Telangana, Rep. ]!y [its ][Principal secretary' ][MA ][and ][UD']Secretariat Buildings,Hyderabad, [Telangana]

2The Greater Hvderabad [Municipal Corporation, ][Rep' ][by its ][Commissioner']BRKR Bhavan, [Tank Bund, ][HYderabad']BRKR Bhavan, [Tank Bund, ][HYderabad']

3. Zonal Commissioner, [GHMC ][Zonal Office Secunderabad']

4. Dy. Commissioner, [GHMC Circle-15, ][Abids, ][Hyderabad']

5. Assistant [City Planner' GHMC Circle-15, Abids, Hyderabad']

6. Smt. V. Vani, [Wo. ][Ravi ][Vittal ][Aged ].about.50. [years' ][Occ ][Business' ][R/o ][1-9-]296tN9,Vidya [Nagar, ][Ram ][Nagar, Hyderaoao']296tN9,Vidya [Nagar, ][Ram ][Nagar, Hyderaoao']

7. Sri V. Ravi, [S/o. ][Late ][V.M. Linhaji Aged about ][50 ][years' ][Occ' ][Business' ][Rl/o'1-]g-296tN9, Vidya Nagar, Ram Nagar, Hyderabao'g-296tN9, Vidya Nagar, Ram Nagar, Hyderabao'

8. V. Manasa, [D/o. ][V. ][Ravi ][Aged ][about ][50 ][years' ][Occ ][Business' ][Rl/o ][l ][-9-]2g1tN9, Vidya [Nagar, ][Ram ][Nagar, ][HyderaDad']2g1tN9, Vidya [Nagar, ][Ram ][Nagar, ][HyderaDad']

..-RESPONDENTS

Petition under [Article ][226 ][ot ][lhe ][Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances [stated ][in ][the ][affidavit ][filed ][therewith' ][the ][High ][Court ][may ][be]pleasedtodeclaringtheactionoffespondentNo.2.5hereininnottakinganyaction against [the ][deviations, illegal ][and ][unauthorised constructions raised ][by ][the]respondentNo.6-8inpremisesNo.l-8.725lB/6i1,1-8-725181612and1-8.

7251,,613, Achaiah Nagar, Narakunta, Hyderabad, as iregar arbitrary and contraryto law and consequenry direct the respondent No.2-5 to forthwith consider thepetitioner representation dr.2g.11.2024 and take action by way of demorishing theillegar and unauthorised 3rd, 4th and 5th froors over the permitted s. 2 froorsincluding the deviations in the permitted S 2 floors in premises No.1-B-72srBt6r 1,1-8-725181612 and 1 -B-721tBl6l3, Achaiah Nagar, Nallakunta, Hyderabad.

lA NO: 1 oF 2024

Petition under section 1sl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to directthe respondents No,2-5 to sear the iregar constructions made. by respondent No.6,the respondents No,2-5 to sear the iregar constructions made. by respondent No.6,7 and 8 in premises No.'r-8-72518/6t1,1-B-z2stBt6t2 and 1-B-z2s/B/6/3, AcchaiahNagar, Nallakunta, Hyderabad U/s.461-A of GHMC Act_1955, pending disposal ofand 1-B-z2s/B/6/3, AcchaiahNagar, Nallakunta, Hyderabad U/s.461-A of GHMC Act_1955, pending disposal ofthe above writ petition Counsel for the petitioner: SRI KATIGHAR ANIL KUMAR

COUNSEI fOr thE RESPONdCNT NO.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRAT,ON ANDURBAN DEVELOPMENT . [-']URBAN DEVELOPMENT . [-']

Counsel for the-RespondentJrl_os.2 to 5: SRI MIDDE ARUN KUMAR,S.C. FOR GREATER HYDERABAD S.C. FOR GREATER HYDERABAD MI,JNICIPAL CORPORATION

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.6 to g: __-The Court made the following: ORDERThe Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI [JUSTICE ][K. ][LAKSHMAN]

WRIT PETITION [No][ 36a76 of2024]

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard learned [counsel appearing ][for ][the ][petitioner']

learned Assistant [Government Pleader ][for ][Municipal]Administration [and ][Urban ][Development ][appearing ][for]respondent [No.1 ][and ][Sri][ Midde ][Arun.Kumar, ][learned]5counsel [appearing ][for ][respondent ][Nos'2 ][to]standing Perused the [record.]

2. In view [of ][the ][nature ][of ][relief ][sought ][by ][the]this [Writ ][Petition ][is][ disposed ][of at ][the]petitioner, admission stage [dispensing ][with ][notice ][to ][respondent]Nos.6 to [8.]

3. The [petitioner ][herein ][is ][resident ][of ][Dwaraka]Residency, [Achaiah ][Nagar, Nallakunta' ][Hyderabad']Respondent [Nos.6 ][to 8 ][are ][making ][illegal ][and ][un-]authorized construction [in ][deviation ][to ][the ][building]permit order. They [have ][obtained ][permission ][for]

construction of Stilt + 2 Upper floors and constructedthree (3) additional floors. The same is un_authorizedthree (3) additional floors. The same is un_authorizedconstruction. In proof of the same, he has .ni.aphotographs. Therefore, petitioner has submitted aphotographs. Therefore, petitioner has submitted arepresentation, dated 29.11.2024 to respondent Nos.2 to5 with a request to take action against respondent Nos.6to 8. 5 with a request to take action against respondent Nos.6to 8. Despite receiving and acknowled.ging the saidrepresentation, respondent Nos.2 to 5 did not act uponthe same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondentrepresentation, respondent Nos.2 to 5 did not act uponthe same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondentNos.2 to 5, petltioner filed the present writ petition.

4Whereas, Sri Midde Arun Kumar, learned .standingSri Midde Arun Kumar, learned .standingMidde Arun Kumar, learned .standingArun Kumar, learned .standingKumar, learned .standinglearned .standing.standingcounsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to s,ooinstructions, would submit that on coming to know aboutthe said un-authorized construction, respondent No.4has issued Show Cause Notice, d,ated. 27.Og.2O24 torespondent Nos.6 to g. They did not submit explanation.Instead of submitting explanation, respondent Nos.7 and8 filed a suit vide O.S.No.2939 of 2024 againstrespondent No.2 seeking perpetual injunction. Vide order Whereas, Sri Midde Arun Kumar, learned .standingSri Midde Arun Kumar, learned .standingMidde Arun Kumar, learned .standingArun Kumar, learned .standingKumar, learned .standinglearned .standing.standing dated 1 l-O7-2024, [in ][I'A'No'7O8 ][of ][2024 ][in ][O'S'No'2939]of 2024 [learned ][VI Junior ][Civil Judge' City ][Civil ][Court']Hyderabad [granted ][interim injunction']

5. However, [learned ][trial ][Court ][observed ][that ][if]respondent [Nos.7 ][and ][8 - ][plaintiffs ][therein ][raises]construction [by ][violating ][the ][permission' ][defendant]- [respond'ent ][No'2 herein ][to ][initiate]corporation [therein ]as [per ][law. ][Even ][then, ][respondent Nos'2 ][to ][5 ][are]action, not taking [any ][further ][action ][against respondent ][Nos'7]and 8 herein / [plaintiffs ][in ][O'S'No'2939 ][of ][2024']

6As discussed [supra, ][it ][is the ][specific ][contention of]that [respondent ][Nos'6 ][to 8 ][have ][obtained]petitioner building [permission ][for ][construction ][of Stilt ][+][ 2 ][Upper]floors and [they ][have constructed ][3 ][additional ][floors]unauthorizedly. [Learned ][Triaf ][Court ][granted liberty' ][to]/ [defendant ][therein ][to ][initiate]respondent [No.2 ][herein ]action against [respondent Nos'7 ][and 8 herein ][/ ][plaintiffs]

therein if the construction is illegal and contra_rv to thebuilding permit order.

7. Sri Midde Arun Kumar, learned standing "orrrr..tappearing for respondent Nos.2 to 5, on instructions,would submit that respondent No.4 will take actionagainst respondent Nos.6 to g, strictly in accordance withthe procedure laid down under the GHMC Act, 1955 byputting the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 to g onnotice and affording them an opportunity of hearing.

8. In view of the said submission, this Writ petition isdisposed of clirr:cting the respondent No.4 to consider therepresentation dated 2g.1I.2024 submitted theby petitioner and take action against respondent Nos.6 to gpursuant to the Show Cause Notice, dated 27.0g .2024.Respondent No.4 shall take all necessary steps to stopillegal / un-authorized construction made by respondentNos.6 to 8, as observed by the learned VI Junior Civi1Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, vide order dated

5

11. O7.2024 [passed ][in ][I'A.No.7O8 ][of ][2024 ][in ][O'S'No'2939]of 2024, strictly [in ][accord'ance ][with ][the ][procedure l4id]down und.G:r [the ][GHMC ][Act, ][1955, ][by ][putting"'the]petitioner and respondent [Nos'6 ][to 8 ][on ][notice ][and]affording them [an opportunity ][of hearing' ][There ][shall ][be]no order as to [costs.]

the [miscellaneous ][petitions, ][if ][any']sequel, Asa pend.ing in the,Wri,t !eti!!gn, th-all [stand ]"',r,;f;ft. IRUttlaln oevt ASSTSTANT [REGISTRAR]sEcrloN B-.r,"r*

//TRUE COPY//

\'1 . The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration [and Urban ][Development']Secretaria[ [Buildings, ][Hyderabad' ][I ][elangana]'1 . The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration [and Urban ][Development']Secretaria[ [Buildings, ][Hyderabad' ][I ][elangana]

2. The Commissioner, [Greater ]. [Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, ][BRKR]-. Bhavan, Tank Bund, HYderabad'-. Bhavan, Tank Bund, HYderabad'

3. The Zonal [Commissioner, GHMC Zonal Office Secunderabad']

4. The Dy. Commissioner, [GHMC ][Circle-'l5, Abids' ][Hyderabad']

5. The Assistant [City Planner, GHMC Circle-15' ][Abids' ][Hyderabad']

6. One CCto [SRI ][KATIGHARANIL ][KUMAR, ][Advocate ][IOPUC]]

T.oneCCtoSRlM|DDEARUNKUMAR,S.C.forGreaterHyderabadMunicipalCorporation [OPUC]Corporation [OPUC]

8. " Two ciiJtt'tJrti6 CCs to Stat6ttieiangana [GP ][for ][Municipal Administration. ]at Hvderabad' [q1Q ][ouT][U@an ][Developmertt' ][High]ITwo CD CoPiesKKSBS

a

HIGH COURT

CC TODAY

DATED:31 11212024

ORDER

WP.No.36876 of 2024

'i-r\''E[OJ--](1'a:1t5L', 1:-)[1 [ii]i']()I

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead