Telangana High Court
WP/23984/2020 of Sandeep Venna Vs State of Telangana on 30 December 2020
the State of Telangana The Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan and The Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy W.P. No. 23984 of 2020 Date: 30-12-2020 Between: Sandeep Venna …Petitioner And The State of Telangana Through its Secretary Department of Home Affairs and
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
High Court for the State of Telangana
The Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh ChauhanandThe Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Vijaysen ReddyW.P. No. 23984 of 2020Date: 30-12-2020Between: Sandeep Venna …Petitioner And The State of Telangana Through its Secretary Department of Home Affairs and Justice Government of Telangana Central Secretariat Khairtabad Hyderabad and 3 others …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. Vedula Srinivas for Mrs. P.V.Aruna Kumari Counsel for respondents: Mr. T. Srikanth Reddy, GP for HomeThe Court made the following:
HCJ & BVR, J W.P.No. 23984 of 2020 Dt: 30-12-2020
Judgment:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy)
This Habeas Corpus Petition is filed for a direction to the respondents to produce the petitioner’s co-employees viz., Mr. Bai Yi (Dennis), s/o Lin Bai, and Mr. Satyapal Kyalia, s/o Harlal, before this Court, and to set them at liberty.
Mr. T. Srikanth Reddy, the learned Government Pleader for Home, submits that the detenus have been arrested in connection with Crime No. 1162 of 2020 registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 504, 506, 509 IPC, and Section 66 and 67 of the IT Act, and Sections 3, 10 & 13(1) of the Telangana State Money Lenders Act, 1349F of Cyber Crimes, Cyberabad, Hyderabad, and remanded to judicial custody. Hence, the cause in the writ petition no more survives. In view of the above,the writ petition is closed.
However, as requested by Mr. Vedula Srinivas, the petitioners are given liberty to challenge the detention order in case they are either aggrieved by the same, or the same is issued in contravention of the provisions of the Cr.P.C.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, stand disposed of as infructuous.
_____________________________
(Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ)
Dt: 30[th] December, 2020 lur
____________________
(B. Vijaysen Reddy, J)