Gujarat High Court
CRA/951/1995 of M/S KHIMRAJ JAWAHARLAL Vs INDIAN BANK on 23 November 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 951 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 951 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- M/S KHIMRAJ JAWAHARLAL
Versus
INDIAN BANK
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
None present for Petitioner
MR DHARMESH V SHAH for Respondent No. 1 None present for Respondent No. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 23/11/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Shri Shah states that this matter is squarely covered by the decision of this court given in the case of Shrinath Traders vs. Central Bank reported in 1999
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
(1) GLH 789.
I have gone through the judgment cited by the learned counsel for the petitioner and I find that this matter is squarely covered by that decision and as a result thereof, this civil revision application fails and the same is dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim relief, result thereof, this civil revision application fails and the same is dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted by this court stands vacated. No order as to costs.
The suit is of the year 1983. Learned trial court is directed to decide the suit finally within a period of four months from the date of receipt of writ of this order.
**********
zgs/-