Telangana High Court
WP/1851/2003 of Sri S.Ananda Babu, Vs The Project Director, on 27 December 2006
SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU Wednesday, 27th day of December, 2006 W.P.No.1851 of 2003 Between: S. Ananda Babu … Petitioner and The Project Director, Drought Prone Area Programme, Chittoor District and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.No.1851
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU
Wednesday, 27thday of December, 2006
W.P.No.1851 of 2003
Between:
S. Ananda Babu … Petitioner
and
The Project Director,Drought Prone Area Programme,Chittoor District and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULUW.P.No.1851 of 2003
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of theinterim orders passed on 21-2-2003 in W.P.M.P.No.2422 of 2003, nofurther orders are necessary. But, the interim order is suspension ofthe impugned Proceedings, wherein the 4[th] respondent was instructednot to execute the work of construction of Diversion Check Dam acrossLacha Reddy Cheruvu Vanka in Madanapalle Mandal till further ordersfrom the Project Director, Drought Prone Area Programme, Chittoor. The said interim order is still subsisting. Now it is more than threeyears since the interim order was passed.
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of directingthe respondents to pass orders afresh, if the cause still survives, afterhearing the petitioner. No order as to costs.
prk
27-12-2006